da vinci code explains jesus blood line ...do he really have blood line?
2007-01-19 20:30:17 · 14 answers · asked by sai 1 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
No one can prove either way.
It is theoretical supposition.
We must remember that there is a differance between proof and belief.A very large difference.
If we accept that he had a human mother. then he did have a blood line.but there is no proof or offically accepted evidence that will support the history of her bloodline.Who her parents were etc.
If we follow the laws of science as we know them in this time.
It follows that, if Jesus only recieved his genetic makeup from one side,that being the female.
Then he would have been female.
As no other human genes were involved.
For we know that it requires male sperm to denote variation in the sex in a child.
Otherwise it is a clone.
I do believe that a man called Jesus existed and was with out any doubt one of the great prophets.
This is not disputed,but supported by historical fact and by other major religions.
What I dispute is the fact that it is feasibly possible he could have been literally, the son of God.
God being an entity, a shapelss form, a power,no begining no end.
This does not detract at all from Gods greatness, in my opinion.
The declaration of divine birth is many thousands of years older than Christianity..
Continually used by the Ancient Egyptians and others, long before the Israelites began to await the Messiah.
Anyone who has been to Pharoah Hatshepsut's temple at Deir El Bahri.
Will be familiar with the beautiful reliefs covering the walls.That show the great lengths she and the priests of Amun made to ensure proof, and describe how her divine conception and birth actually occured.
The Egyptians were just as convinced 3500 yrs ago that thier Pharoah's were of divine birth. As the believers of Christ's similar birth in 2007.
How could it not be? They would have said.
The Pharoah was believed to be and worshipped as, a divine representative or son of the God, Amun Ra.
Sent by him in human form to guide and protect them.
Doesn't this all sound a bit familiar?
To me it has no bearing on my ability to believe.
If I am truthful, it makes it easier to believe in Jesus the Prophet.
I often wonder if it could be proven that Jesus did have a human bloodline on both sides,male and female. Would those who believe in his immaculate conception loose thier faith?
Surely true faith could not be that shallow!
2007-01-19 21:39:50 · answer #1 · answered by sistablu...Maat 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
To be quite candid, yours is a question none of us can answer with any certainty. We'd probably never know the whole truth about Jesus or his purported bloodline; so why bother? All we have flying around are series of presumptive statements. Nobody can prove anything really.
2007-01-19 20:39:08 · answer #2 · answered by Akimbo 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
NO.
He never married, He never had sex, He never had children. Why are people in such a hurry to knock God down a peg? Is it because you can't imagine your life without sex?
Well thousands upon thousands of men and women in this world have lived and died their whole lives as virgins. It's not so hard a concept to grasp, people.
Thank you for calling me an idiot, more treasure in Heaven for me. If you're asking if Jesus ever had children, the answer is no. If you're asking for the blood line of Christ through Mary or Joseph, his adopted father, that is clearly defined in the Bible. Read the Gospels.
2007-01-19 20:33:01 · answer #3 · answered by Last Ent Wife (RCIA) 7 · 3⤊ 2⤋
Counterproductive question. What's really important? Matthew 7 : 12 and 1 Corinthians 13 : 4 - 7 are what's really important.
2007-01-19 20:39:31 · answer #4 · answered by neuroaster 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
forget the Da Vinci Code and its copycats. there's no bloodline, on account that there is 0 historic information for the existence of the needed character in Christianity. he's made up.
2016-11-25 21:51:37 · answer #5 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Hahahah how easily ppl are fooled and Dan Brown is laughing all the way to the bank.
Educate yourself , do you think Dan Brown is right and over 1 billion Christians wrong?
2007-01-19 20:47:01 · answer #6 · answered by carl 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Only through His brothers and sisters - Mary and Joseph had children
2007-01-19 20:41:30 · answer #7 · answered by whathappentothisnation 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No. It's a sign of the end time that a work of fiction about God would be taken as fact by so many who are mislead by the antichrist spirit in the world today.
2007-01-19 20:38:55 · answer #8 · answered by hisgloryisgreat 6 · 0⤊ 2⤋
problematic point query at the search engines it could help
2014-07-20 21:05:40 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Anyone who answers with a definite answer is a fool. We will probably never know
He wasn't a decendant of David either. The bloodline was supposed to be through through Joseph who wasnt his biological father
2007-01-19 20:34:19 · answer #10 · answered by Nemesis 7 · 0⤊ 6⤋