Do we have an obligation to future generations to explore the full potential of genetic engineering?

Question

To do this, we need to free it from religious based restrictions. Most Christians say that cloning is an unnecessary science, that may well be, but don’t you think we should find out for sure? If it is as they say, then we can abolish it. But we should at least try. After all, it has the potential to be a science that benefits our species immeasurably.

Answer 1

I have no problem with using genetics to make people better. I think you are misunderstanding the arguments against certain types of research. It has to do with ethical principles. Would you kill a baby in order to save someone with cancer? There is story that certain new born infants were being harvested in the Ukraine. They would tell the parents that their child died but then take the baby's stem cells. I'm not sure if there has been any new news on that story or if the concerns were unfounded, but you can imagine how it might happen if that was the only way to get good stem cells. There would be an underground market for fetuses.

If they can use umbilical cord stem cells without any harm to anyone, then sure go ahead do all the organ creation you want. It would be a huge benefit to society. I think people just want to avoid what happened to the jews in the name of science. Did you know that we wouldn't know a ton of stuff about the body if it weren't for the nazi's medical experiments on people. They tested hypothermia, oxygen deprivation, organ transplants, and so many more things that were absolutely horrible to do. I personally wouldn't trade all that knowledge for the life of one of those human beings. So although great things can be learned, it is important to do it in an ethical way, even though I am not really sure a fertilized egg is life. I am not trying to classify what IS moral, I am just saying that is why there is such debate.

Answer 2

People get taken in by means of scare strategies in regards to human genetic engineering. The truth is that we already supply our all to make our kids as well as they may be able to be. If we will supply our kids all of our strenghs and none of our weaknesses, what's real improper with that? Even get rid of the genetic legacies of sickness that experience plagued humanity given that recorded historical past started? The movie 'Gattaca' was once at the start set to finish with a coda naming folks with genetic disabilities who, they are saying, could not ever have lived had genetic engineering been in traditional use. Einstein, Ray Charles and Stephen Hawking had been amongst them. However, one must as a substitute bear in mind how some distance stated folks could have acquired WITHOUT their genetic drawback - and in addition bear in mind what number of different inspirational folks would have lived. On the entire I consider the intent folks - believers, agnostics and atheists alike - are scared is on account that of the Nazis. In reality the Nazis had been many years in the past or even given a loose rein and limitless assets with their hideous experiments they could not ever have learned some thing of significance, given that they had been opening from a incorrect end - the specified reverse of well technology. (But I occur to be antagonistic to GM vegetation considering the fact that they devise a marketplace inside a marketplace if you want to harm small firms comparable to household-owned farms.)

Answer 3

No. Almighty God is changing the system. The one we live in right now is run by Satan. It will cease.
The New System will have Jesus as the leader and we will all obey him.
And those who do will have a future life in the flesh on the earth.
Psalm 37; 9,11,29,34

Answer 4

Don't worry the whole world is doing this research, the fact that it will be they not the USA who reap the profits doesn't matter all that much.

Answer 5

no obligation