I think the hopeful sentiment on the statue, while a sweet reminder of a bygone time, lost its punch when they had to stop Americans from going up inside due to risk of terrorism.
2007-01-19 16:37:57
·
answer #1
·
answered by DAR 7
·
3⤊
0⤋
They already gained. A federal court docket of appeals has overturned the ruling of a U.S. District choose, which blocked Summum's proposed monuments, putting ahead that equivalent area on the city parks ought to easily accept to all religions, no longer in basic terms Judeo-Christian ones.. criminal professional Brian Barnard, who represents Summum, says he's pushing his shoppers to exhibit their Seven Aphorism's in pleasant Grove once plausible. This win by no ability compels others to exhibit monuments in competition to the ten Commandments or anti-American monuments. you're uninformed. In Salt Lake County and Ogden County, similar court docket cases were further, and gained, by technique of Summon. The Counties reaction? They bumped off the ten Commandments, putting ahead that no non secular monuments might want to be displayed interior the universal public parks. attempt getting your info instantly first. playstation (i'll inform that whoever receives perfect answer in this "question" might want to be the only which has the same opinion such as your POV. I in basic terms concept you may like a touch info to bypass jointly such as your fiction).
2016-10-15 11:43:04
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
The statue of liberty must be respected and must not be associated with drug cartels, human traffickers and gangsters. These criminals must be welcomed to prisons.
2007-01-19 15:43:50
·
answer #3
·
answered by FRAGINAL, JTM 7
·
3⤊
1⤋
Maybe the statue of liberty was a Trojan horse from the French.
2007-01-19 15:41:40
·
answer #4
·
answered by bake_no_fry 2
·
0⤊
3⤋
I say hire with trillions of our tax dollars policemen and investigators to root them out, kick them out and stop all this crime as best they can.its time we demanded our freedom from crime in this country,and to hell with giving it all away to other country's. the money we could save could cut crime in half.and not so much of this taking over and just attacking other country's and save on the military spending Y'all
2007-01-19 15:51:27
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
you said it right. i do think those criminals should be sent to prison. and the american govt needs to stop kissing mexicos rear.
2007-01-19 15:50:50
·
answer #6
·
answered by monreda 4
·
3⤊
0⤋
You nailed that one right on.
2007-01-19 15:40:54
·
answer #7
·
answered by russ t 2
·
2⤊
0⤋
No, we have enough of those already.
2007-01-19 15:39:27
·
answer #8
·
answered by Al Dave Ismail 7
·
3⤊
0⤋