Is God plopping men on earth made from dirt and clay in his image to test them to see whether they believe in him a good alternative theory to geology and biological evolution?
2007-01-19 14:50:28 · 14 answers · asked by janesweetjane 2 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
lol....Gary you are really funny. Why don't you go to college, at least take in a few good text books on geology and biology, instead of analyzing and going over and over some ridiculous ramblings of primitive middle eastern men written for and about barbarians thousands of years ago?
It may do you some good and bring you into the 21st century.
2007-01-19 14:56:27 · update #1
Well, evolution is a scientific theory, and creationism/ intelligent design is a belief based on a bronze age book with little to no evidence to support it. Faith is required to believe in anything so far-fetched as creationism or god.
2007-01-19 14:54:46 · answer #1 · answered by manic.fruit 4 · 6⤊ 0⤋
Because the fact of evolution was proven many times over with physical evidence, such as bones and DNA. Animals are made from the elements that are found in dirt and clay. Is it so hard to fathom? Arguing evolution seems so pointless, any thing else is just belief. Does not mean it is unimportant, probably should not be taught in biology class though.
2007-01-19 15:08:12 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Because evolution is based on an examination of archeology, geology, paleontology and numerous other scientific processes that examine EVIDENCE .
This is so self explanatory, the question is almost absurd.
Creation theory comes from the bible, period , faith, not facts nor any studying, FAITH (also self explanatory)
Creation is a good alternative for people whose brains cannot get far enough to process scientific concepts.
Some people need creationism to compensate for that,
But that is OK, because it changes nothing about reality and if they need it for mental reasons, so be it.
2007-01-19 15:00:40 · answer #3 · answered by kate 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
easily the pulonium halos provide a tremendously clean message of reality about introduction. those are signatures in good rock of aspects whose 1/2-existence is so short that they and the granite might want to have had to come back into existence concurrently interior a matter of seconds to provide what we see. in the interim, all of us keep in mind that organic and organic evolution wouldn't have time to provide the completed array of existence sorts we see on earth because a million) the solar has been shrinking gradually and a couple of) the moon's orbit is higher each 3 hundred and sixty 5 days. bypass lower back a lot farther than 6,000 years and the earth is frying even as the gravitational pull from the moon creates tides so intense and violent that the little existence sorts don't have time to evolve earlier being swept away.
2016-10-15 11:40:03 · answer #4 · answered by bucci 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Where is the evidence for evolution? I would like to see it. We all know that there is NO evidence for evolution. It is not a scientific theory, because nothing in science points to evolution.
Nothing in science points to creation, either. People can speculate as to our origins, but science is silent on the subject. There is nothing in science that demonstrates our origin. It can't be duplicated or repeated. It can't be falsified. So why is evolution called scientific? Where is the science?
It is a metaphysical belief to explain creation without a Creator. It is a religion. It takes faith to believe, because there is no evidence. Imagine, grown people thinking they are descended from apes. It is laughable.
2007-01-19 15:02:25 · answer #5 · answered by iraqisax 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Evolution is based on evidence because there is evidence out there that supports it and creationism is based on faith because the only way you can believe its true is if you have faith in it, because there is no evidence for it. To answer your second question I do not believe that creationisma a good alternative to the scientific standpoint because I cannot extend my faith to that level.
2007-01-19 14:55:12 · answer #6 · answered by The FudgeMaster 2 · 3⤊ 0⤋
As a Christian, I believe in stages of evolution. However, I don't believe in the big bang theory of existence.
To me, that would be like believing an F5 Tornado moving through a junk yard of Boeing 747 airplane parts, all disassembled, could in the after-math, produce an airplane!
2007-01-19 14:58:50 · answer #7 · answered by n_007pen 4 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Because that is the plain truth. There is no real evidence to support monotheism other than faith it doesn't exist
2007-01-19 14:55:30 · answer #8 · answered by dogpatch USA 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
creationism is based on faith Dunaway...have you seen her in dancer in the Dark??? simply spectacular!!! i recommend everyone this film, you could not stop crying
2007-01-19 14:57:26 · answer #9 · answered by whoknows 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Evolution is not based on fact it in FACT is based on just as much faith as creationism. Until you find the gew that started the first singled cell organizim and the fossils that prove we evolved then you know what im putting my faith in creationism!
may God bless you and everyone you love!
2007-01-19 14:57:34 · answer #10 · answered by ilovepointeshoes 3 · 0⤊ 5⤋