English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2007-01-19 13:40:38 · 7 answers · asked by THE MAN 1 in Sports Outdoor Recreation Hunting

7 answers

I think you are a child if so do your parents know what you are doing on line. If you are talking about the .22lr Ak clones that are out there I do not know as I have never shot one. But for the most part any of the AK Clones wild hold up to any thing you could do to it. Now go to bed like a good little boy.

2007-01-19 15:33:16 · answer #1 · answered by idotusa 3 · 1 3

I had a Mitchell arms AK-22 years ago. It was an extremely well made rifle. Walnut wood, nice deep blue, good sights, compact, reasonably accurate.....not bad.
I have seen, but not handled the Armscor rifles. They appear to be very similar to the Mitchell, but there were some visible differences. The stock was of some undetermined hardwood, Parts of the reciever appeared to be cast aluminium or pot-metal
painted black. These parts were heavy and robust, though.
The Mitchell guns were avalible with a 30 round magazine that simulated the appeaerance of a 7.62X39 magazine. The Armscor guns have a similar, but lower capacity (10 and 15 round) less visually convincing magazines.

2007-01-20 02:49:38 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

The Armscor AK-22? Yeah, it is a pretty good rifle. In fact I was going to buy one but decided to save another $200 and get a real one. But it is by no means a bad rifle. It looks just like the real thing and the .22 ammo won't eat away your wallet like the 7.62 does.

By strong do you mean powerful? If so then no, it is just .22s not a lot of power there. But if you mean strong as in durable and reliabe then yes it is.

2007-01-19 21:57:37 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 3 0

I wouldn't hunt butterflies with a .22. Get a .30 caliber. Most AKs are .30 caliber. They're not hard to find, and they're not terribly expensive either. If you want something even cheaper, get an old 30-30. Ballistically, it's practically a clone of the AK. The lever action is antiquated by today's standards, but a practiced hand can work it almost as fast as a modern semi-auto. Besides, in hunting, it's the first shot that counts anyway. If you miss it, you probably won't get a second chance, so it doesn't matter how many shots are in the mag.

2007-01-19 21:54:38 · answer #4 · answered by texasjewboy12 6 · 0 4

my 6 year old cousin had a ak-22. spend about $100 more and get a real AK. ak-22 is still a gun, still has power, and still can kill. its definetly not the strongest gun in the world.

2007-01-20 12:05:55 · answer #5 · answered by cparkmi331 3 · 1 0

Yes, it's a good one.

2007-01-22 21:59:36 · answer #6 · answered by mountainclass 3 · 0 0

Why would you ask a question like that?

2007-01-19 21:48:39 · answer #7 · answered by fiveftcutie 1 · 1 7

fedest.com, questions and answers