http://shapersquest.com/beau/html/images/INDIAN.jpg
2007-01-19 11:32:44 · 23 answers · asked by Anonymous in Beauty & Style ➔ Skin & Body ➔ Tattoos
Yes. That would be very ugly. If you get a tat you should be prepared to live with it and love it. Yes they can be removed now but an elbow would be a very hard place to get something removed. Also if you do go thru with getting ink you should make sure it's not some back door place. It needs to be a professional place with all the right creds. I only bring it up because all the shops I know wont do work on someone under 18. Your 16. Perhaps you should let this idea rest until your 18th birthday. Thats the day I got my 1st tat and I love it. But then again it isn't some funky indian either. Good luck.
2007-01-19 12:57:26 · answer #1 · answered by ? 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
I think yes....but if u want to know what it would look like. Print of a picture of a indian head off or draw one. and put it on ur elbow and hold it there with your hands and ask your friends what they thing and look in the mirror to see what you think...but rememer when u turn like 60-70(not meaning all 60-70 year old) but when u get that age ur body gets to be wrinkaley and then u have a wrinkled tattoo on ur elbow
2007-01-20 16:59:14 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
wait until you can legally get one at 18. think long and hard about it. if it means something to you, no tattoo is ugly. 16 is a little young for a tat, though. might want to wait a little longer. plus, on the elbow would be painful, and would distort the tat when your arm is straight. pick another place that can be concealed, like a shoulder.
2007-01-20 01:24:41 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
In my opinion, anything on the elbow would be ugly. The elbow is a joint, so it would bend and stretch and a tattoo probably wouldn't look good unless it were held in a certain position.
So, I think yes. It would be ugly.
2007-01-19 11:40:54 · answer #4 · answered by willow oak 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
if that indian head means anything o u then go for it !!
better than atramp stamp or a stupid angel or heart or btterfly
just do something u think u will like at least for the next 5 years or so
personally im against someone that young to do a tatoo coz u stil have alot to mature and u wont keep on liking the same things.
if i had a tatoo at 16 i would ave done a tramp stamp pukeeee
how would i live with that?? im 20 btw :)
anyway gl with ahatever u do just make sure the person ur doing it at knows what he / she is doing.
xxx
2007-01-19 11:47:29 · answer #5 · answered by Lara^mt 5 · 2⤊ 1⤋
16 years old? no offense but i think that's an ugly tattoo and on the elbow that would make it even worse.
2007-01-19 12:52:33 · answer #6 · answered by sys 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
On your elbow??? Every time you straighten your arm, it's gonna be all scrunched up, and you won't be able to tell what it is. But, I think it would look fine on almost any other part of the body... shoulder blade would be much better.
2007-01-20 05:57:15 · answer #7 · answered by hunting wabbit 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Plain and simple, yes.
You're too young. I love tattoos but they are a very adult decision and I think you're too young. And especially to get one in such a visible area isn't the best idea.
Sorry, I know I'll probably get thumbs down for this one, but I can't help it.
2007-01-21 13:43:29 · answer #8 · answered by KarenGus 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Maybe not the elbow because it'll be harder to conceal when you're older, but if you choose that tattoo in a more sensible place, it'll be gorgeous, that tattoo is very nice!
2007-01-19 12:25:27 · answer #9 · answered by T 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
That would be a horrible place for a detailed tattoo. The skin is too thick there. I would suggest waiting till you were a little older also. You may change your mind completely in a few years.
2007-01-19 11:46:03 · answer #10 · answered by ~LYNZ~ 3 · 2⤊ 1⤋