2007-01-19 08:37:50 · 16 answers · asked by STFU Dude 6 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
Yes, actually eyebrows can form babies through cloning. Not on their own, but stem cells in a test tube can't develop into babies on their own either.
2007-01-19 08:45:32 · update #1
No. The cells in the eyelash will not, if left alone, become a human being.
The cells of a blastula/foetus, left alone, will either naturally miscarry or grow into a fully featured human being.
Thus the eyelash cells have no moral human potential, whereas the blastula/foetus does.
It is also immoral to create a blastula/embryo/foetus outside of the body as currently practiced. Current in vitro fertilization produces many fertilized eggs and many are discarded. Only if the process could be limited to one egg which is fertilized and then implanted would it be morally acceptable.
2007-01-19 08:43:24 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
Dude, BIG difference! Let me explain: an embryo has the very real possibility of becoming a HUMAN life! The cells of an eyebrow create nothing more than an eyebrow. The cells of an embryo have the chance to create a new HUMAN life. I see your logic, but there is a big difference! HUMAN life is fragile and special and one of a kind. Please don't take anything away from the fact that you are a breathing, living, human being! .
2007-01-19 08:49:15 · answer #2 · answered by visitorparkingonly 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋
initially, Roe v. Wade became no longer widely speaking about determining personhood. That became interior the decrease courts. The splendid court docket argument and determination became concerning privateness (which got here about to concentration on the medical technique of abortion). Secondly, even as the "experts" testified as to even as someone is called living outdoors the womb, keep in mind that this became determined at a time earlier ultrasound technologies and microcameras used for surgical applications. for sure, that is been confirmed considering that existence is truly a lot alive even as contained in the womb. So the technology interior the decrease court docket rulings are previous besides as being inaccurate. third, the argument centers round a "locality". In different words, that isn't any longer someone because that is contained in the mummy, as a lot because the day earlier delivery. Then, by wonder, that is someone. Why? What has replaced? Self-know-how isn't carried out till round 2 years of age or older. So, legally, why is it no longer someone? What has been carried out? a newborn is one hundred% depending on its mom to stay, both earlier that is born and after. Fourth, even as a male human and a woman human party and function a uniting of sperm and egg, that makes an self reliant human. It would not make another creature. You and that i are human, continuously were human beings, and continuously will be. we are continuously classifed as homo sapiens, whatever level of existence we take position to be in. the female in the back of Roe v Wade is now a staunch professional-existence supporter. Why do you imagine that is?
2016-10-15 11:18:08 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I suppose by their standards , I am committing murder every 28 days when I lose an egg, that could have been a baby, with my period. And since I have lots of sex while on birth control my husband kills something like a billion potential babies every week, cause that sperm ain't fertilizing no egg.
2007-01-19 08:43:56 · answer #4 · answered by Sara 5 · 3⤊ 0⤋
If the eyebrow will one day become a human being that God has a plan and purpose for, and loved before its birth, then yes.
2007-01-19 08:41:42 · answer #5 · answered by Doug 5 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Nope no matter what that eyebrow will never grow to be a fulling functioning human being.
A human embryo does have chance to be come a fulling functioning human being.
2007-01-19 08:44:32 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
If your eyebrow is truine in nature and is a living being with a body,soul and spirit then, yes.
2007-01-19 08:43:21 · answer #7 · answered by bonsai bobby 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
An embryo is a human and an eyebrow is not.
2007-01-19 08:42:14 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Killing a few cells of your own body is not murder. Killing all the cells of someone else's body is murder.
.
2007-01-19 08:41:49 · answer #9 · answered by PaulCyp 7 · 3⤊ 1⤋
Here comes the "potential to be human" argument. I don't see anyone calling for muder charges for men who masturbate or people who get fertility treatments, though.
2007-01-19 08:46:10 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋