that we share a common ancestor with mandrills?
=0)
2007-01-19 08:13:39 · 16 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
Oh, if I could double-up on the thumbs up! =0)
2007-01-19 08:21:41 · update #1
I do not think it is offensive either way, we are talking about theories.
2007-01-19 09:56:19 · answer #1 · answered by SeeTheLight 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Yes, because they would have to google mandrills. And that's a lot of effort for the typical R&S user.
2007-01-19 16:16:35 · answer #2 · answered by STFU Dude 6 · 3⤊ 1⤋
We share a common ancestor with trees if you back far enough.
2007-01-19 16:27:38 · answer #3 · answered by michaelb1020 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Do they understand that we also share a common ancestor with cats?
2007-01-19 16:24:16 · answer #4 · answered by TRITHEMIUS 3 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Not at all. It might be less offensive to say Normal humans are highly evolved apes, except creationists- who are "god's gift" to humanity worldwide- sent to entertain us endlessly.
2007-01-19 16:19:45 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Would it be to much to ask why scientists haven't proven that genetic mutation produces different species after countless failed attempts?
2007-01-19 16:16:57 · answer #6 · answered by LIVINGmylife 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
What? Did you learn a new word at school today? Good for you honey.
2007-01-19 16:43:55 · answer #7 · answered by angel 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
No. I think the bulbous purple a__ would be offensive.
2007-01-19 16:17:58 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Would that be Barbara or does it include the sisters?
2007-01-19 16:26:03 · answer #9 · answered by Dave P 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I KNOW FOR A FACT Fireball doesnt know what you mean
2007-01-19 16:16:39 · answer #10 · answered by Sean 5 · 2⤊ 1⤋