2007-01-19 08:08:27 · 31 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
Mr. The Dude, you deserve 20 points for that answer!
2007-01-19 08:16:50 · update #1
David Koresh's compound was a lot smaller.
2007-01-19 08:11:21 · answer #1 · answered by STFU Dude 6 · 11⤊ 3⤋
Yes, Pat has a much larger following. He even has some politicians behind him. He ran for president one time. David Koresh was never taken that seriously by normal everyday people.
Pat is much more dangerous because if the feds came and busted him, there would be a great outcry among mainstream Christianity. David was a cult leader and Pat is considered a mainstream preacher. Unjustly, but he is.
I believe Pat is a little smarter than David in that he knows just how far he can go and then retracts statements when the public crys out.
Pat is much better at manipulating the majority, while David had a very small following.
2007-01-19 08:18:22 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
David Koresh liked the ladies! Pat just drools a lot...usually over himself.
2007-01-19 08:12:36 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 0⤋
Yes. Pat Robberbaron - oops, Robertson - was a coward who won't die for his beliefs as Koresh did.
Instead of carrying a gun, Robertson was a "liquor officer" during the Vietnam war, hiding far behind the lines. And getting drunk, no doubt.
Read this:
http://www.schlatter.org/liquor.htm
.
2007-01-19 08:16:53 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
Pat Robertson is an evangelist, albeit an apostate one, but David Koresh believed he was Christ incarnate - or at least led his believers to accept that he was.
2007-01-19 08:19:29 · answer #5 · answered by FUNdie 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
The number of followers. Koresh had a smaller number of people to control, which is how they ended up dead. It's very hard to convince thousands and thousands of people to come to your compound, start a fire, and not have a single one of the thousands of people escape.
)O(
2007-01-19 08:13:13 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
No, i do no longer, they are the two as incorrect as one yet another ... yet i think of the vast majority of human beings might agree that Pat Robertson is a nut job. I is surely no longer disappointed while he dies.
2016-10-31 13:31:03 · answer #7 · answered by bason 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
David got a mini-series. Pat's TV program goes on and on.
2007-01-19 08:43:10 · answer #8 · answered by skepsis 7 · 4⤊ 0⤋
Koresh was "knocking out" all the husbands wives, and didn't let them get any. Robertson is Impotent!
2007-01-19 08:14:09 · answer #9 · answered by Mr Meanie 1 · 2⤊ 2⤋
Yes, Pat Robertson isn't claming to be the messiah, doesn't have multiple wives, and doesn't live in a compound. Koresh was truly bad, Robertson sometimes is arrogant but seems okay.
2007-01-19 08:12:13 · answer #10 · answered by Brad R 4 · 2⤊ 5⤋