http://news.bostonherald.com/localPolitics/view.bg?articleid=177974
2007-01-19 00:05:20 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Immigration
It´s sickening. I think that illegals should be counted for population purposes only, hopefully making it easier to track down and deport them, but NOT to gain Congressional seats. MA has really stooped low this time and I´m already not a big fan of the new governor Deval Patrick, especially since he rescinded Romney´s bill that would have allowed State troopers to arrest illegals.
2007-01-19 01:48:48 · answer #1 · answered by Double 709 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Firstly, "millions in funds that are appropriated by the congressional district" are at stake. (Does one even have to wonder about the fleece-lined pockets of the state's Congress people?)
Secondly, the far-left is concerned about that imperiled vote: Mass has a rich history of fielding some of the finest elected officials in the country---Teddy and John Boy.
Lastly, added to this vomitous slurry is the office of Ali Noorani's, Massachusetts Immigrant and Refugee Advocacy Coalition.
I'd love to see where the funding for this "group' comes from.....possibly Soros and the Gang?
RICO Statute is what I think about this
2007-01-19 00:26:43 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Statisticians could properly be very sensible. of course, they won't get a head count style, so as that they're going to could desire to look at what archives they are in a position to get and devise a sort to count style the form of illegals. as an occasion, in an area with 500 residences, in case you don't get replies from one hundred of them, you are able to assume they are illegals. then you definately take the favored style of folk in residences in that community and multiply it for the time of those one hundred residences. Your outcomes could be precise, or they could no longer be. the actually fashions they use will in all danger be plenty greater complicated than my occasion.
2016-12-14 05:32:54 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Illegal alien's votes are already counted. ID is not required at the poles to vote (at least where I live) so it is very easy to vote just by knowing someone Else's name and address. It has also been
documented that absentee ballots are used for illegals to have their vote count.
2007-01-19 00:57:06 · answer #4 · answered by joevette 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I say they'll probably get away with it. In my opinion, illegals are NOT citizens, so should not be counted in that sense. If they start counting them in Mass, next is NY, CA and TX. Will we be giving them the right to vote next?
2007-01-19 00:18:44 · answer #5 · answered by ~StepfordWife~ 3 · 3⤊ 0⤋
A congressional seat (be it state or federal) is in place to represent the citizens of that area. If a person lacks citizenship then obviously, he/she can not be considered a citizen and does not qualify to be represented.
(Politicians know that but hope you don't. )
2007-01-19 00:22:46 · answer #6 · answered by we_are_legion99 5 · 3⤊ 0⤋
I don't know how anyone else feels about Massatwoshits But in my neck of the woods- they are only part of the US by default.
In Mass. they think it's okay to do alot of stuff the rest of the country finds offensive. Thank God it's 100s of miles away from me.
2007-01-19 00:38:43 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Typical mindless Liberal state. The Founding Fathers are turning in their graves.
2007-01-19 00:31:04 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
the irony of it all! its hilarious
2007-01-19 01:27:28 · answer #9 · answered by ladiB812 4 · 2⤊ 0⤋