I bet you text message alot hehe. My answer would be that Jesus Christ promised me salvation.
2007-01-18 20:12:52
·
answer #1
·
answered by Darktania 5
·
3⤊
1⤋
Yes and no. If you are capable of truly looking at both sides of a situation and analyze each, then present your case to this person as a meditor would, then yes. But if, in the middle of your own conversations, the emotional takes charge of the factual and realistic, you are not ready. That's when you prepare a sheet of paper for each side, and began the pros / cons -- or mine / yours. Treat this as legal assignment in your own mind. Submit the list, when completed to the (at least) one day test. If you still have the same articles on both sides and are sure you covered everything, then give a copy of the document to your aggressor; and give this person time to do their own analysis. Set up a discussion when both parties are prepared -- you may receive a revised list before the meeting, and you have to be willing to accept this as part of a mediator's job. Go through the process again prior to the meeting. I do believe that you, Vot, would be capapble of mediating. It takes someone who is logical and rational at all times. You cannot be the judge, however, but if you can get both parties to agree to a settlement, then the job is done. I have been unable to do this because the person who wronged me was drinking on the sly and openly and with other women -- as any alcoholic would. The paper would be torn up and thrown in the trash. I can maintain my cool and do my best to keep other situations completely under control, but in cases where the other party is more emotional than anything else, or on a bender, it is impossible.
2016-05-24 06:17:55
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
God doesn't have to ask, as you should well know. Do you realize that your english reminds us of YE OLDE ENGLISH, lol, those people couldn't spell worth a darn either, but they sure were stuck up, I doubt any of them did as Jesus asked either and I bet they all counted on going to heaven for their beliefs too. I of course refer to his remark that faith without works is a dead faith. And by the way, Jesus had nothing to do with the book of Romans, only the pharasees did.
2007-01-18 20:23:15
·
answer #3
·
answered by Marcus R. 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
As a Christian, I'm only acceptable to God due to the death (sacrifice) and resurrection of His Son, Jesus Christ. Therefore, I would throw myself on he mercy of God and trust in His promises that I am covered in the blood of the Lord, that my sins are thus covered and no longer requiring my death (being sent to hell) as payment.
In other words: Jesus died that I might live. Thanks be to God!
2007-01-18 20:14:04
·
answer #4
·
answered by Julia A 3
·
3⤊
0⤋
I might say that I didn't do that badly considering what the Creator gave me to work with.
Incidentally, if you go to hell for bad spelling and grammar you're in a heap of trouble.
2007-01-18 20:19:23
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋
I'll take what's behind door number 3. Wow, it is the Summerland. I win.
2007-01-18 20:48:28
·
answer #6
·
answered by metoo 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
I can't even read your question! Could you at least take the time to spell all your words out before you post in future, please?! Is this representative of your arrogant religion? I noticed that the only word you spelt out, and capitalised, was GOD. Oh, and die. weird.
2007-01-18 20:42:25
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
0⤋
If you haven't even gotten through learning kindergarten-level English, you aren't ready to make a decision on what to have for lunch, let alone one on matters of spiritual conviction.
2007-01-18 20:12:26
·
answer #8
·
answered by gomez_leovinus 3
·
3⤊
1⤋
I hate people who write like this. Arghhh. You'r going to hell.
2007-01-18 20:15:57
·
answer #9
·
answered by cannabia 3
·
5⤊
1⤋
Jesus is my lord and savior only though Him and Him alone am I made righteous.
2007-01-18 20:23:11
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋