'Wild Cambodia jungle-girl' found
A Cambodian girl who disappeared aged eight has been found after reportedly living wild in the jungle for 19 years.
Rochom P'ngieng's father says he has identified her through scars but she cannot speak any intelligible language.
Ms Rochom P'ngieng disappeared tending buffalo in Rattanakiri province, 350km (220 miles) north-east of Phnom Penh.
Local police said she was "half-human and half-animal". Her father says he will have DNA tests taken to prove she is his daughter.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/asia-pacific/6275623.stm
without domesticating social conditioning a human is no different than any other wild animal?
2007-01-18 16:19:26 · 12 answers · asked by nebtet 6 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
In the interest of empirical integrity (not theistic apologetics), all we know is that she cannot say she believes in anything (God or otherwise), not that she has or lacks any particular belief.
2007-01-18 16:26:20 · answer #1 · answered by neil s 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
hey don't get confused between humans and wild animals because if God wanted to created us animals we re all would' ve been animals not humans. the way you talk is wrong never make
God's feels that he made a mistake. because i don't care what sciences said a animal will always act like a animal and look like
a animal train or not. and a human being will always be a human
being wild or not, because we re as human has something a animal will never have sence. you know when you are wrong and you can juge things. a animal cannot tell that. a animal was born to be wild, but you did not born to be wild ours sin made us wild not God. byeeeee
may the lord be with you
2007-01-18 16:41:37 · answer #2 · answered by marcel m 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, I don't think so. We still have the innate skills that have helped us to become civilized. Yes, a undomesticated person may run wild, but she will still have the probing mind that sets humans apart.
As for God, people like the Cambodian girl may not have a word for it, but when early humans looked at the night sky, with thousands of stars, it filled them with awe, like it does us today. This awe, this wondering what is out there, is part of being human that is innate.
2007-01-18 16:26:19 · answer #3 · answered by MissM 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
It has to do with economic forces. The way the workplace and the family have been structured, the gender-based division of labour made a kind of economic sense. However, real wages have dropped, and it is increasingly difficult to support a family on a single paycheque, so it is unlikely that gender roles will revert to "pre-feminism".
2016-05-24 05:53:21 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
You are absolutely correct. The fact that civilization, with air-conditioning and fast food, has caused the human race to be LAZY. Yup.
2007-01-18 16:24:24 · answer #5 · answered by Cold Fart 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Humans have instincts too. If we do not develop our minds, we will act no better than wild animals.
2007-01-18 16:24:09 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Thats because humans ARE animals.
Animals have no concept of religion.
2007-01-18 16:23:38 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
It's worth pointing out that almost every culture develops a mythology.
2007-01-18 16:22:40 · answer #8 · answered by STFU Dude 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Ferrel children have been found in many parts of the world, but what is interesting in the research, is the children's inability to empathize, this researchers said is what separates them from us.
2007-01-18 16:27:10 · answer #9 · answered by ? 3 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Religions need God, but God doesn't need religions. Religions do prove that God does have a sense of humor.
2007-01-18 16:25:17 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋