Is it ironic when religious people discredit evolution by calling it a religion?

Answer 1

very super ironic

Answer 2

Well it is. It certainly isn't science like chemistry. You can't prove anything about complex life forms yet.

Have some examples to show me on humans?

Did you know that once Psychologists tried to prove that people act a certain way because of how they looked.

This is a FACT of science.

it's also a fact people ONCE believed (wrongly of course) that Pluto was a planet and that the solar system had 9 planets. We now know, of course, the solar system only has 8 planets.

It's SOOOO hard to believe those MORONIC people from the DISTANT PAST, you know, the 1930's, 1940's, 1950's, 1960's, 1970's, 1980's, 1990's -- them OLD GUYS actually believed there were 9 planets!

Ah

Superstition put to rest!

Answer 3

No, I think they sound the same or fall into mutual categories.
Like human origins for one. But religion is more so important for its morals.
Science was officially framed after in this age and I see it as a replica of religion in ways of explaining already present frame work of human origins.

Like how can you say or ask: what is reality, if there already is a reality and if you even are aware of it's presence or not or if you should even be aware or are made to be capable or incapable and not made to be capable...vice versa?

And I didn't say they are the same, only that science sounds like religion (Bible), when people talk about evolution, because evolution sounds like adam and eve and the change brought onto "cain" and "ham' descendent: cainnon." They sound parallel; they sound the same in revealing and explaining human origin, but are not otherwise.

Both the following are changes:
These curses = Bible. (religion/The Bible)
These skin colors = the evolution. (Science/Evolution)
I think people are fascinated by the word "evolution."
Evolution is their explaination.

Answer 4

Religion is the adherence to codified beliefs and rituals that generally involve a faith and a study of inherited ancestral traditions, knowledge and wisdom related to understanding human life. Why on earth would it discredit evolution?

Answer 5

evolution is not a religion, anyone that puts it in any sort of a religious catogory is just plain misinformed. you dont need faith to understand evolution, it is a fact. i dont have to go outside rational thought or understanding to know that evolution is real. as far as religion is concerned you have to go all the way on faith becouse you dont have any rational proof of any of it. the so called proofs of god are not proofs at all, they are superstitions. most of the teachings of religions profoundly ask you to cast aside reason for faith. i find it amazing the amount of people who are and are being brainwashed by religion in this day and age. science is showing that these religious belief's are unfounded and a big percentage of people are waking up to the truth. so when religious people say that evolution is a religion in it's self, they are merly doing so becouse they see that they themself's are irrational and need to drag someone els down into the pit of delusion with them. rather than admit that their religion is a fairy tale and they got suckered. poor people, i pity them for the waste their lives have been so far, they could have had alot more time to better the world instead of holding back progress for the rest of us. it's too bad that the rational person who rejects religion has to be subjected to the pointless drivel that works it's way into our government and opresses the population. the evolution debate is just one example of how christians want to interject their uninformed views onto the general population, they lobby congress for laws that are based on their biggoted ideas and they think they can use scripture for proof that they are right. the idea that we should base our laws on a flawed book that was wirtten by a group of people who had a very limited view of the world is just unacceptable. I myself will not vote for anyone who shares these religious views. the movement is on in the united states stronger than ever to rid our government of these sort of dogmatic views. reason will win out .

Answer 6

Yeah its in problem-free words human beings no longer understand-how what "idea" means. i have were given no clue the position the lay definiton arose from. I do understand what idea means, and am somewhat precise learn up on Darwinistic wondering. and somewhat, if its proponents are to be believed Darwinism is higher a paradigm for each concern, which has been utilized to the taking off position of existence, than in problem-free words a idea for the taking off position of existence. yet Im nonetheless no longer provided. My major qualm is with novelty. i'll make certain counsel on the thanks to get a group of canines and save breeding the fast fluffy stressful ones jointly till you get Pomeranians. i'll even see how finally you'll finally finally end up with some without eyes or 2 tails or although. What i do no longer stick with is counsel on the thanks to bypass from a in a lot of circumstances used component like there being no krebs cycle to right now you've one. it would want to no longer artwork incrementally, its an all or no longer something proposition. Or the interest. Say each organism were eyeless. to make confident that the interest to artwork you bypass with various elements. there's no longer any way a in part formed eye might want to be of use to an organism, so no reason it would want to be so universal. I also do no longer understand if i imagine the perfect time scale. it type of feels like a case of the concept being bent interior the direction of a purpose, because of the particular reality the advice is largely non testable. Plus I somewhat have a complicated time accepting something as medical "reality" that has sturdy philosophical implications. Scientist may be in problem-free words as dogmatic as popes, and they many cases have an agenda. Case in information, "international climate change".

Answer 7

definitely. Evolution is another observation in science. People that don't understand knowledge think that since our origin is not completely clear, that a theory much older and not actually proven (creationism) must be right...this logic still escapes me. if scientists held on to old theories like religion did, people would be arguing that there is absolutely no evidence that the earth is round.

Answer 8

I don't understand your question. A religion is a system of beliefs. It isn't necessary that it incorporate a higher power, though religion usually does. So it makes perfect sense for evolution to be a religion. Even atheism, a belief in no higher power, can be considered a religion.

Answer 9

They're used to practicing religious hatred and intolerance, so they just pulled out an old trick and redefined the enemy as a religion. After all, evolution condradicts their church doctrine.

Answer 10

Yes.

It's equally ironic that they distrust science, but then try to make scientific arguements against evolution (like when they bring up the second law of thermodynamics).

Answer 11

It's not only ironic, but a little frightening that in a world as advanced as ours, there are people who use their "intelligence" for nothing more than a word game.