Q 1:Do you support sending more troops to Iraq?

Question

Q 2: If so, Have you or are you going to join the military?

Don't you think it would be a great way to show your support? ;)

Go get 'em Tiger!

GRRRRR!

Answer 1

No I don't. But I do support getting somebody new in the White House who doesn't confuse democracy with dictatorship.

Answer 2

If this means that the terrorists stay where they are instead of bringing the war here to us as they did on 9/11 then by all means. And whether we like sending more or not the troops that are there now need more help. I say 100% support for our troops and God Bless them and America.

I'm a 26 year vet of the US Army.

Answer 3

Absolutely NOT. It was a mistake to begin with and has only
gotten worse. We are now in a quagmire that gets deeper
every day and its our military that are suffering needlessly.
Now they are told their deployment will be extended. What's
that all about.
20,000 troops will be leaving Ft. Lewis, WA in April. I don't
know about other bases.
I will give you info that is public knowledge and was in
yesterday's Seattle Times--The USS Stenmenn aircraft
carrier left Bremerton yesterday, on its way to San Diego
where it will onload 80 fighter/bombers and a huge arsenal.
This is a strike force and it has 8 destroyers going along.
There is already an aircraft carrier over there. These ships
will be patrolling the Persian Gulf and "monitoring" Iran.

Answer 4

I am a navy wife. If Bush needs to send more troops over in Iraq to win the war and take care of business then he has my 100% support. My husband supports his decisions as well. We need to do whatever it takes to make it right over there.

Answer 5

I think their fools for going,but I know they really think their fighting for the country,like in Nam 60,000 dead and wounded for life who knows?The fact is they died for nothing ,(what the hell was that war for??)Or this one? So we say sorry dint see any weapons but we will hang your leader now.(after all he tried to kill my father) and oh look you have all that oil ,and we need some.We could use some bases here too,the Saudis kicked us out,My families great friends,that send money and builds schools all over the world that teach hate.But even if they are the main reason for the troubles we cant touch them because the make my family money.So now we will look for osama in Iran By the way lets bring a few million to the U.S.A. and lets leave the borders open .The man is Insane

Answer 6

Don't you think it would be a great way of support to have never starting this Iraq War to begin with ? Tell me where are the WMD's and those iranium inrichment programs Bush was looking for ? Never found. Iraq is based on lies, and I hope congress doesn't send anymore troops and saves thier lives instead of putting them to thier deaths. Try that for support.

Answer 7

1. yes.

2. 18 years US Navy Submarines vet.

and it is long over due! error in Iraq has been from the begining not enough troops!
General Powell doctrine (Gulf War 1): if you are going to get in a fight get in with EVERYTHING you have or don't get in at all!

Answer 8

No, becuz I believe we will not be sending enuf, again. And we will just continue to be occupiers in hostile territory. Not enuf there to win & keep the peace. We need MORE help from the UN, NATO & everyone else as this is a global fight on terror.

Yes, they are making some progress & our men & women are trying very hard to keep the peace & deter the terrorists. BUT President Bush, himself, said that once they clear an area & move on it's got to be covered again.... there's not enuf to secure the borders so terrorists just keep coming in. Does it make sense if you have a breach in a dam to have irrigation in certain areas to try to keep the level down but don't secure the hole?

Answer 9

i imagine we ought to continually no longer be forwarding extra of any international places troops to Iraq. Their tirant has been bumped off and they have there own governing bodies to a particular degree. nonetheless it truly is kind of a conflict-zone. extra son those who stay international might want to state obviously that they could strive against for there own u . s . a . previously the only they stay in, so why do they no longer go back and form the problem out for themselves. carry the boys homestead to their international places and if Brits enable them kind our streets out as we positive choose them right here! i think they could benefit extra useful administration than our policeforce who're stunned with crime.

Answer 10

No I don't.
But most of the population (lambs, custodiated - watched over, by wolfs costumed as shepherds), as log as they are not involved, don't care about it. But there are powerful people - wild and land less -who do care about sending more troops. They know they will never be affected, and they want others to fight for their selfish interests. Their fortunes, their incomes, their profits. Humans live doesn't matter. Them are worthless.

Answer 11

No we need to steadily pull out of Iraq, just sending more and more troops in will make us think that we can do anything, making us try to hard destroying out country. it is not a good thing.