When Bush Killed 3000 Americans in Iraq Did He Pause and Think...?

Question

"Whoa, Buddy... LOL How'd the heck did I do THAT?"

Micheal, you should 1) work out your brain by reading books and 2) get an honest avatar, one that shows the beer gut and prognathous brow.

OUCH BABY! -- Now we're gettin' somewhere, ssss.

Bush is responsible for their deaths, directly responsible as clearly as if he took a gun and shot those brave and innocent young heroes down. I stand for patriotism, which is why I can call him a treasonous homicidal maniac.

Flynn, I love the rehearsed response many of you cons have adopted that says "Sure lots have been killed, but it's nothing compared to other conflicts, or to Iraq's own casualties..."
---Try telling that to a woman whose only son was crucified on a cross of lies and greed by Bushco.

Answer 1

I think Bush killed them. Soldiers are supposed to defend their country not to invade and occupy other countries.
At the same time I think those soldiers went to Iraq for money. Shame on them ....
We cannot change anything. Leave them alone...

Answer 2

WRONG. You are so wrong. First, Bush didn't purposely KILL anyone. Did he say go to Iraq, yes he did. I'm not completely for the war but I'm not completely against it either. He had/still has a goal for Iraq. From what I've seen in US history, we never quit. We don't give up so why should Bush just pull out now and make us look like cowards? No, it shouldn't be done that way.

Plus, all you ever hear about in Iraq is the bad stuff that happens. The media is extremely negative about the war. You never hear about all the families that are able to go out in the street without having to worry about being killed because of terrorist. Think about the overall goal of what we are doing - to unite. We have freedom so why shouldn't we try to help other people achieve that freedom? Is that such a horrible goal? Yes, lives are lost but think about how much better it will be after this is over. Whenever you gain you have to lose. Having such a one track mind about a issue doesn't help you form a solid opinion about it. That's why i choose to be neutral in one of the biggest current issues America is faced with because people gain freedom but lives are lost. Its not great but its not horrible either.

Also, treating Bush like his is a murder doesn't help the situation. It won't change what has happened.

Answer 3

Sounds to me like you need to stay away from the media.

If you were to actually take the time to speak with a great many troops - the majority believe in what we're doing and believe in Bush.

I know lots of contractors who've also been there (former military ones) who also say we need to be there.

Quit deciding to believe the worst about what is going on - and learn some facts.

Answer 4

Regardless of where you stand on the issue of the U.S. involvement in Iraq, here's a sobering statistic.

There has been a monthly average of 160,000 troops in the Iraq theatre of operations during the last 22 months, and a total of 2,112 deaths.

That gives a firearm death rate of 60 per 100,000 soldiers.

The firearm death rate in Washington D.C. is 80.6 per 100,000 persons for the same period.

That means that you are about 25% more likely to be shot and killed in the U.S. Capital than you are in Iraq.



Conclusion: The U.S. should pull out of Washington ! ! !

Answer 5

In all of the past wars the young men that were killed were drafted. All of these men have volunteered. How do you figure. I think you have had a little too much to drink tonight. It is the liquor talking and you have diahhrea of the mouth. Get some reality.

Answer 6

You're pathetic. Just as I will most likely be flagged for insulting you, you should be flagged for not giving true thought to the weight that rests on the shoulders of anyone in the Oval Office. If you were there, you might be even worse at governing than he is, so pipe down! Authority comes with the HEAVY burden of responsibility. I'm sure he knows he will have this on his conscience for the rest of his life. And, here I thought more liberally minded people were supposed to be about compassion, not hate.

Answer 7

Wow, the President must have been pretty damned busy to be in so many places around the world, and still be able to get to Iraq to personally kill 3000 American soldiers.

Why don't you stop trolling with your inane BS?

Answer 8

I don't think Bush has killed anyone. Those 3000 brave men who gave their life for us, volunteered for the military. And then were killed not by Bush but by terrorists shooting at them or car bombing them.

You really aren't making any sense. Someone who willingly enlists in the military, fully aware that they may die in combat, is killed in Iraq and it is Bush's fault instead of the terrorist who pulled the trigger?

That is like if there was a school shooting, and people blamed the administration for the shooting since they were the ones who MADE the school, instead of the person who actually pulled the trigger. It just makes no sense.

Answer 9

My Friend, if only I could put into words how to express my dismay at what you have written. Please realize that your very words are being used by the terrorists to enhance their cause. NOW a question for you. What is the terrorists CAUSE.

Answer 10

Absolute truth, you speak.