Maybe they really were created from dirt.
2007-01-18 12:17:36 · 11 answers · asked by Alucard 4 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
You know, which would you rather be:
A person created from dirt in the image of God?
Or an evolved ape that happened by chance, and really doesn't have any purpose here... it just happened.
2007-01-18 12:33:46 · answer #1 · answered by *Melody* 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
How does one "LOOK" unevolved? I'm kind of curious as to your strange terminology. Do we look like cave people; exactly how do you define this description of creationists?
2007-01-18 12:26:09 · answer #2 · answered by lookn2cjc 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I've never met someone who actually /believed/ that Adam and Eve were the first. I don't believe in it because I know that it is not the only creationism myth and it most certainly wasn't even the first.
2007-01-18 12:21:25 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Great scientists like Johannes KEPLER saw God's magnificance and constantly gave praise to God Almighty for his wonderful laws built into nature. He was a creationist.
So did Isaac NEWTON.......and he wrote 1 million words about his LITERAL belief in the Scripture. He was a creationist. " I have a fundamental belief in the Word of God....I study the Bible daily". - Isaac Newton
The electromagnetic equations of James Clerk Maxwell attest to the Magnificant mathematical inginuity of the Creator.
He was a Creationist.
Its only the ignorant who can't figure it out.
2007-01-18 12:20:43 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
Ad Hominem attacks are not helping the debate. Besides, if they're alive, they've evolved to meet their needs in the current environment.
I'm on your side of the debate. Don't trivialize it by turning it into a name-calling contest.
2007-01-18 12:22:26 · answer #5 · answered by NHBaritone 7 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Some people want to be related to apes.
I would rather believe how God made man in His image.
2007-01-18 12:23:16 · answer #6 · answered by robert p 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
hmm personal attack on people who are creationist?
I am a Christian and I do not think you would label me a "creationist" by what I believe.
However, you don't need to be asking questions that are actually a statement.
A statment that seems to be a lame joke.
2007-01-18 12:21:59 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
I have not particularly noticed that. But it is reasonable to suppose that their brains are not fully evolved.
Postscript: Scientists noted by first responder flourished before Darwin. If they were active now, they undoubtedly would have accepted evolution, as it is now a proven fact.
2007-01-18 12:21:43 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
i did my english speech on creation vs. evolution in science. see if you still think i'm "unevolved" after you check out these websites:
http://www.answersingenesis.org/tj/v13/i2/teaching.asp#f43
http://d21c.com/of-christ/articles_8.htm
http://www.pathlights.com/ce_encyclopedia/07prim02.htm
http://evolutionfairytale.com/articles_debates/fossil_illusion.htm
2007-01-18 12:23:41 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
ignorant kaffer. just some more christian perfection on show here. just reading your question tells me how low you are
2007-01-18 12:23:18 · answer #10 · answered by DEICIDE 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋