Seymore says they need broad and smooth doctrines to be able to ride up and down on, on a consteint basis. Mike says, they need something tight with guidence as to how fast they should pound the truth into others. How do you feel on this philisphoical question?
2007-01-18 12:07:45 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
I find your question to be very exciting.
2007-01-18 12:11:50 · answer #1 · answered by iamnoone 7 · 3⤊ 1⤋
Don't know about the philosophy but, I'm willing to bet they were having this discussion in that bar with the sign out front that reads "Liquor in the front : Poker in the rear".
2007-01-18 20:16:35 · answer #2 · answered by cudala 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Well, I'm definitely not going to say I'm full of the holy spirit, but I do like Hunt's gospel!!
2007-01-18 20:13:00 · answer #3 · answered by sm177y 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Sounds like a real cunning stunt
2007-01-18 20:11:21 · answer #4 · answered by Pauline 5 · 3⤊ 0⤋
These two friends should come together with their theories and create a soup of new ideas.
2007-01-18 20:13:20 · answer #5 · answered by T Time 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Ask Heywood.
2007-01-18 20:09:21 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
all this religious debate is making me want to bust a load
2007-01-18 20:12:10 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Ben Dover might know. Ask him
2007-01-18 20:10:50 · answer #8 · answered by nachosmyman 3 · 3⤊ 1⤋
I feel horny..thanks a lot
2007-01-18 20:09:28 · answer #9 · answered by Tina 3 · 2⤊ 0⤋
I think your sophomoric humor is lacking.
2007-01-18 20:10:57 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋