I think you might be getting confused with a police record and a criminal record. There is NO WAY you can get a criminal record for just being arrested. You would need to be charged and then convicted of a crime by a court to get a criminal record.
As for whether he gets a police record, then he may possibly. But a 'police record' is a vague term. In all likelyhood, it just means his name will be added to the police computer so if he is ever stopped by the police in the future they may be able to verify who he is and whether he's lying about his name and address etc.
Also, there has recently been a change to the law in the last year which means that if he has given his dna to the police, it can be stored on the database to identify him in the future, even if he hasn't been convicted of any crime! So, unless there is another change in the law in the future, they will most likely have his dna for life. So if he ever commits another crime and leaves a trace of a hair or sperm behind for example, the police will know who it belongs to!
This change came about in the last year or so i believe. Previously, the police were required to destroy all dna and other evidence such as fingerprints and mugshots if no charges, or conviction was brought.
2007-01-18 15:35:18
·
answer #1
·
answered by Alex 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
Get a No Cost Background Check Scan at https://bitly.im/aNCXz
Its a sensible way to start. The site allows you to do a no cost scan simply to find out if any sort of data is in existence. A smaller analysis is done without cost. To get a detailed report its a modest payment.
You may not realize how many good reasons there are to try and find out more about the people around you. After all, whether you're talking about new friends, employees, doctors, caretakers for elderly family members, or even significant others, you, as a citizen, have a right to know whether the people you surround yourself with are who they say they are. This goes double in any situation that involves your children, which not only includes teachers and babysitters, but also scout masters, little league coaches and others. Bottom line, if you want to find out more about someone, you should perform a background check.
2016-05-20 19:02:13
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
although you've been convicted, there'll be an previous record someplace, yet no coverage is a motoring offence and by no ability a offender offence, so maximum agencies will in common words want to charm to close once you've any modern-day or modern-day motoring convictions. verify precisely what they are soliciting for beofre you answer, you may no longer want to declare this one. OR Get a print of your record, it expenses £10 paid at your community police station and could coach something that has been recorded as a conviction
2016-10-15 10:15:42
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
It depends what kinds of threats and whether the threats were towards a particular group ie...was it an homophobic or racist incident.
It may result in a caution, or at worst a court appearance and Youth Offender team intervention.
To answer your question fully we need to know more of the nature of the threats.
2007-01-18 08:49:43
·
answer #4
·
answered by lippz 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Not thouroughly familiar with how it works in the UK, but you usually have to have a conviction for it to be on record, not just the arrest - in civilized modern countries.
Then again, I'm sure he already has an MI-5 file.
2007-01-18 08:50:10
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Depends if the CPS think its in the crowns interest to take to court, If he is bailed to return to the Police station 90% of the time he is given a caution, especially these days as the prisons are full overflowing.
2007-01-18 12:30:41
·
answer #6
·
answered by Steve 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Depending on what your laws are there in the UK yes at least until he is 18 he will have a record. If he has not been convicted or went to court rather on this tell him to go for a jury trial . It is all going to depend on what he said and whom he threatened it's there word against his so jury trials in some cases cost more money so then the state or district attorney probably won't press the issue. Check on your laws by you you can do that by the Web. Good luck and I hope this helps
2007-01-18 08:57:40
·
answer #7
·
answered by Super Mom 3
·
1⤊
2⤋
If he has been arrested, fingerprinted, dna taken and charged to appear in court and found 'guilty' in court, then yes. If he is charged and sent before the court and found 'not guilty' then NO. If he is only 16 he is a juvenile and will need to have an appropriate adult present when he makes a statement or is charged.
2007-01-18 08:48:23
·
answer #8
·
answered by JillPinky 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
He will if he's convicted. A point to note all potential people arrested for whatever, you can and must refuse to give fingerprints or a mugshot. The police cannot make you give them until you have been convicted in a court of law.
The police will always try to rush you into doing so.
This is a legal right.
2007-01-18 08:49:42
·
answer #9
·
answered by tucksie 6
·
1⤊
2⤋
it depends on the threat and if it can be proven that he did actualy make the threat if it was writen he will get done probaly a caution but depending on the threat and what it was and why he made the threats and if it was verbal deny it
2007-01-18 09:58:34
·
answer #10
·
answered by ? 5
·
1⤊
0⤋