why govt is not implementing the retirement age for politician?

Question

Minimum age to join Lok sabha is 25 and for Rajya sabha 35 then why not the retirement age?
Supreme court judge retires after 65 yrs then why not politician?

Answer 1

It will never happen as a major part of politicians are above 60yrs.
It will never happen because they will not get any votes for this implementation.
Politician will tell that youth are the future of India but by the time the youth get his/her chance he /she will be a senior citizen.
So wishes can't be converted into deeds.

Answer 2

Almost the entire Rajya Sabha and the Lok Sabha will have to retire because majority of the members in these houses have crossed their fifties and they enjoy to ruin the life of the common people.

They never want the new generation to come to power and take the initiative to make the country grow economically. They just want to benefit for them and let the country go to hell. If an age limit for retirement is set how will they burn and earn at the cost of the country.

The supreme court judge is a Government Servant so has to retire anyways. The politicians are the Government and not the servants, this is the logic.

Answer 3

Even if there is no retirement age for politicians they can be booted out if their performance is unsatisafactory like any other senior executive of a corporation. Public do have the power to do so. You have to find the proper means.

Provide them enough fringe benefits after serving no more than two terms and hopefully they will get out.

Longer they stay, the more they are bound to make more mistakes of one kind or another and more likely to end up in the jail due to the very vigilant media these days - the old days of "make hay while the sun shines" are long gone. Most people would say - what's that.

Answer 4

Because it is the politicians who have to implement this reform. And I'm sure the 'respected elders' in the system won't like to let go the easy income (white and black) that they are getting. And yes the minimum age is set to make sure that the whole nation does not end up in the Parliament and the existing ones can live easily at least for 25yrs.

Answer 5

for politics one should and must need experience to tackle the situations to control the nation so according to me a politician should and must be an aged person(around 40 years to maximum 70 years) to hold that particular position or post with good health so according to me our government is ok with this.
the younger persons can't tackle the evil situations properly due to lack of experience means when age grows mind grows and that particular person will be mentaly strong to defend so government should and must not implement the retirement age for politicians.

Answer 6

Only the politician has the power to amend a rule and implement it, but it won't happen because all the politician are above 50 yrs old and if they implement this sort of rule then they have to go home.

Answer 7

In our country, besides, we don't think of that all of the life experience that a senior has is something yet a large plus. maximum folk see politicians for what they are actually....and do forget the subject concerns that our flesh pressers have ....and be attentive to that maximum of it is as a results of the reality that no person has ever exceeded actual marketing campaign finance reform. considering that our device is desperate up so as that politicians ought to have inner maximum donations to run their campaigns, we've a equipped-in flaw in our device....our flesh pressers OWE some group favorable remedies...often on the price of something of the citizenry. yet, the governance of over 3 hundred million human beings demands very lots of experience, familiarity with archives, and the means to decrease spectacular to the nub of issues....to get something performed. In government, we in u.s. have self belief interior the concept that has been so worthwhile for our companies.....bypass away significant judgements to those that are experienced, and be attentive to the way "issues" artwork. childrens now have not got any experience, nor do maximum of them understand something approximately history. final human beings i could have the opt to make judgements for me.

Answer 8

because maximum number of politicians will retire and the can not dig holes for themselves

Answer 9

Why should older people, regardless of what their job is, be excluded simply because of their age? That smacks of bigotry.

Answer 10

Because if they did then that then they would be doing good for America, they don't want to do that. That would "ruin" their image don't you know.

Hope this helps.