nice try, but I had these questions when i was in school.
LOOK THEM UP! Do your own homework!
2007-01-18 04:32:18
·
answer #1
·
answered by MES 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
1.for nourishment to survive.
2. Farmers dont use that many chemicals, they want to protect the ground as much as everyone else, or they would hove nowhere to grow their crops. Organic is not better.
3. We improve our crops all the time by cross breeding, selecting, and even GMO.
4. There is a need, GMOs provide more options for producers, such as higher yields, less chemicals used, stable supplies.
5. Not a lot of evidence, havent been around long enough to get real long term affects, but its not something to worry about, our government wouldnt let something hurt us.
6. We decide by whether it is economically beneficial, will help society, and isnt an apparant risk.
7. Different policies come from economics, social issues, and different cultures, and politics.
8. NO
9. NO
10. GMOs would help world food supplies, crops can be developed to grow in different areas of the world, and can be developed for better storeage ability, and for higher yields of the crops.
11. Proteins are digested and degraded by enzymes in the stomach and further digestion occurs in the small intestine. This process takes the proteins you consume and coverts them into the component amino acids by breaking the covalent bonds which connect the subunits of the proteins.
12. Yes fertilisers make a difference, they greatly increase yields, and quality of crops.
13. FOR. GMOs have been helping the world for years. There are many reasons, a few are, higher yields, disease resistant crops, crops that require less chemical applications.
2007-01-18 05:57:06
·
answer #2
·
answered by codelili128 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
1. For nourishment to survive.
2. Farmers dont use that many chemicals, they want to protect the ground as much as everyone else, or they would hove nowhere to grow their crops. Organic is not better.
3. We improve our crops all the time by cross breeding, selecting, and even GMO.
4. There is a need, GMOs provide more options for producers, such as higher yields, less chemicals used, stable supplies.
5. Not a lot of evidence, havent been around long enough to get real long term affects, but its not something to worry about, our government wouldnt let something hurt us.
6. We decide by whether it is economically beneficial, will help society, and isnt an apparant risk.
7. Different policies come from economics, social issues, and different cultures, and politics.
8. NO
9. NO
10. GMOs would help world food supplies, crops can be developed to grow in different areas of the world, and can be developed for better storeage ability, and for higher yields of the crops.
11. Proteins are digested and degraded by enzymes in the stomach and further digestion occurs in the small intestine. This process takes the proteins you consume and coverts them into the component amino acids by breaking the covalent bonds which connect the subunits of the proteins.
12. Yes fertilisers make a difference, they greatly increase yields, and quality of crops.
13. FOR. GMOs have been helping the world for years. There are many reasons, a few are, higher yields, disease resistant crops, crops that require less chemical applications.
2007-01-18 04:40:41
·
answer #3
·
answered by Larz 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
Well, I'm not going to do all your Homework for you - although I do usually like to post 'almost correct' answers to Homework Q's .. so here are a couple ...
"What evidence is there of how food additives can affect us?"
Americans are so full of additives that their Bodies no longer rot in the ground. .. this is leading to a Grave problem (since they can not longer re-use the same plots after the first body rots away)
"Can we live without food?" - absolutely ! There are enough additives in water to keep us alive indefinitely
2007-01-22 03:31:31
·
answer #4
·
answered by Steve B 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
In your dreams... answer all those for ten points! I could answer 5 separate ones from other people questions and earn the same. And what sort of question is "GM: the great debate – for or against? discuss" There is no right or wrong answer in a debate!
2007-01-18 04:32:58
·
answer #5
·
answered by Emma L 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
it is relatively some questions beginning from textile technological awareness to philosophy to politics and greater. Too many for me. i will positioned a penny's well worth in although. a million. understanding the medical and philosophical foundation of issues is a demonstration of intelligence. putting it into action is a demonstration of awareness. Politically (you pronounced 'could') we tend to be plenty greater clever than clever. 2. Bio fuels from GM vegetation are ok by utilising me. 3. Sustainable 'progression' capacity the form (in spite of it is) is able proceed indefinitely. The word is the ethical extreme floor from which one team tells yet another that their fulfillment won't final and might even do away with possibilities from destiny generations. not the worlds maximum unique positioned down. nonetheless have you ever observed how crowded it is getting?
2016-12-16 07:35:25
·
answer #6
·
answered by zell 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Ah, I see a flaw in your clever plan. You obviously posted them here because YOU don't know the answers - so how will you determine who gets them right or not? Anyone could come on here, post a bunch of crap, and you'd fall for it.
Maybe you should just do your own homework. That would be safer.
2007-01-18 04:27:25
·
answer #7
·
answered by eri 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
Well farming is a good career. A farmer is a man outstanding in his field
2007-01-18 04:35:32
·
answer #8
·
answered by bwadsp 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
12 questions in one. Um. Quite a nice way of saving 55 pts!
2007-01-18 04:28:38
·
answer #9
·
answered by ? 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
go do your own homework you need to know the information for your exams and if you have the time to be posting it on here you have the time to look it up yourself
2007-01-18 04:38:23
·
answer #10
·
answered by carol p 4
·
0⤊
0⤋