English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Why can't scientists tell by now the effects of water erosion as opposed to ice and glacier formations? Can't everyone see that every single rock formation was created by floods and not anything else?

2007-01-18 04:16:12 · 17 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture Religion & Spirituality

17 answers

Um... because they weren't.

2007-01-18 04:19:29 · answer #1 · answered by boukenger 4 · 2 4

Universal statements are seldom useful and the truth of them is even more rare. While I do believe that there was a "great flood" and that there is evidence to support such an event, I do not, however, buy into the statement that a"every single rock formation was created by floods and not anything else,"

2007-01-18 04:21:14 · answer #2 · answered by Bud 5 · 0 0

You've never gone hiking in the White Mountains and seen the scrape marks, have you? Some flood, that. And curious how it left all these escars and giant boulders lying about, but seems to have stopped at the Blue Hills and left all this sediment...and how the scrapes and escars match the scrapes in, say, Greenland or Chile. I wonder why this could be?

2007-01-18 04:29:56 · answer #3 · answered by Mr. NoneofYourbusiness 3 · 0 0

So... the rock formations created by Mount Saint Hellens exploding were created instead by a flood and not, as supposedly recorded, the mountain blowing itself apart?

Those conspiracy buffs must have faked the footage of the mountain exploding! There was no real volcanic explosion! And the government has brain-washing machines by the mountain to make people just BELIEVE they see a half blown apart volcano, but it's really still one mountain, right?

2007-01-18 04:22:04 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

Because there is plenty of evidence, physical evidence that is, that shows these rock formations have other causes. Like wind. Plate tectonics. Etc. That's why.

2007-01-18 04:48:26 · answer #5 · answered by Existence 3 · 0 0

Evolutionist are always looking for a way to convince themselves of foolish things in spite of evidence to the contrary.

Evolutionists invent all sorts of things as they go along.....everytime something doesn't work out right they invent another theory to keep it current with the latest discovers which keep invalidating their last assumption....it is really laughable.

And sadly, convincing themselves is not enough for them. They have to further perpetuate their deceptions by spreading around to our nations youth.

The thing to remember is that evolution is still just a theory - a hypothesis, a speculation, an unproven assumption.

2007-01-18 04:21:37 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2 3

I hope you're joking but I have my doubts.We can just dismiss volcanic and seismic processes? Do you even know what igneous, metamorphic and sedimentary rocks are? I do and I know they aren't formed by deluges of water.

2007-01-18 04:20:04 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

They don't because these formations don't match the typical erosion patterns of water erosion.

For example:

http://www.talkorigins.org/indexcc/CH/CH581_1.html
http://www.talkorigins.org/indexcc/CH/CH581.html

2007-01-18 04:26:00 · answer #8 · answered by eigelhorn 4 · 0 0

Okay, lady, how about you just go read your bible and leave science to the people that actually have an IQ above 25.

2007-01-18 04:30:07 · answer #9 · answered by Laura 5 · 0 1

Actually, most have ruled that out for various reasons. You should study geology.

2007-01-18 04:21:46 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

I wouldnt go as far as to say every single one however many are!

2007-01-18 04:20:38 · answer #11 · answered by revdauphinee 4 · 1 1

fedest.com, questions and answers