2007-01-18 00:55:52 · 13 answers · asked by Anvil dale 1 in Health ➔ Other - Health
no i had my first child at 31 and except for the gestational diabetes everything went fine. And the gestational diabetes had nothing to do with my age. after 40 you should start to be concerned.
2007-01-18 01:00:31 · answer #1 · answered by RHONDA P 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Are you kidding? Women are having babies well into their 40s these days, though for some that IS risky. There is always SOME risk, but 30 is generally pretty good, even early these days. It depends more on the health and genetic makeup of the individual, moreso than it depends on age. So a woman should discuss pregnancy with her doctor, who can evaluate her specific situation better than anyone on Yahoo Answer is going to be able to do!
2007-01-18 01:01:01 · answer #2 · answered by Mr. Taco 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, that isn't any longer volatile. even as there's a moderate decline in fertility interior the early 30's, maximum females are fertile and in a position to have toddlers into their previous due 30's and early 40's. And once you're asking abour threat on your health or genetic defects -- no longer an concern till the previous due 30's.
2016-10-15 09:50:37 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
it is not risky to be pregnant at age 30
2007-01-18 01:04:45 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
no i don't think that it is risky for the woman of 30 because in this age woman is fully matured and are ready to give birth to a child.
2007-01-18 01:01:59 · answer #5 · answered by puneet s 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Absolutely Not if she is healthy. If she has a compromised immune system or other health issues it could be very risky for her or child. A Washington Mother of 8 who was 56 years old gave birth to triplets and she was not trying to get pregnant. Her babies were healthy.
2007-01-18 01:01:07 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
My wife is north of 35 and 12 weeks pregnant. A woman in Spain gave birth a few weeks ago and was 67.
2007-01-18 01:03:37 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, 30 is still very young. You really don't have much to worry about until you're over 40....that's when pregnancy is more dangerous. My sister started her family when she was 36 and her girls are now 22 and 24. She has been a very active Mom and still is. She had no problems whatsoever.
2007-01-18 01:51:10 · answer #8 · answered by vanhammer 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
From a genetic defect standpoint, the baby has the best chance of being normal when the mom is 22. The odds of a defect go up year by year. A 30 year-old is something like 2-3 times more likely to have a birth defect than a 22 y.o., but the odds are still small. The key is good perinatal nutrition, and we now know that folic acid supplements greatly reduce genetic defects. Take your folic acid. and talk to the doctor.
2007-01-18 01:01:18 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 3⤋
No. It is a prime child bearing age. Physical and mental maturity makes for a good mother. There are no extraordinary physical dangers to the mother or child.
2007-01-18 01:01:04 · answer #10 · answered by regerugged 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋