2007-01-17 17:30:24 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
I think we have an excellent understanding of how evolution created the diversity of life today from the humblest of beginnings.
We may not ever know exactly what form that humble beginning took, but there are enough plausible theories to convince me that there are a number of possibilities.
A creator does *not* need to be invoked. Nature is wonderful enough in itself.
In my opinion!
2007-01-17 17:36:42 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
All theories are subject to change or elimination pending new information. However, the ToE has withstood the constant testing of a century and a half, which speaks very well for it. It is so far the only theory that explains ALL the evidence. If there is a flaw in it, so far none has been demonstrated.
This does not mean that there are not gaps in the evidence. There are, but you don't need every single piece of a puzzle to see the larger picture.
2007-01-18 01:35:57 · answer #2 · answered by Scott M 7 · 3⤊ 0⤋
If by "flawed" you mean "still contains unanswered questions, like any scientific theory," then yes, of course I do! But with that definition of flawed, I also realize that both the cell and atomic theories are flawed.
2007-01-18 01:43:42 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
You're only saying that Butters because you were created perfect in every way. Not like that fat a**s Cartman. And there is such a thing as natural evolution that is rarely taught or discussed in schools. (At least when I was in one.) They proved that in England during the Industrial Revolution. Certain white moths that didn't turn grey fast enough to match the soot colored tree trunks were eaten.
2007-01-18 01:38:50 · answer #4 · answered by Bratster 3 · 2⤊ 0⤋
There are atheists who revise evolution, just like any field of study. But I have yet to meet one who rejects the theory.
2007-01-18 01:34:16 · answer #5 · answered by STFU Dude 6 · 4⤊ 0⤋
It has to be flawed if it made man the "superior" creature on the Earth whose favorite passttime is making war, polluting the envornment, polltuing their own bodies and pushing buttons on remote control boxes.
Natural Selection made this the SUPERIOR being on Earth!
2007-01-18 01:45:44 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
No; nobody has come up with any alternative scientific theory, and the only objections are on religous grounds.
You'd have to be a religious fanatic to reject it.
2007-01-18 22:39:49 · answer #7 · answered by eldad9 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Not the basic tenet that life forms change over time.
2007-01-18 01:36:26 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
Not really, it's pretty spot on IMO (i'm an agnostic/atheist)
2007-01-18 01:34:30 · answer #9 · answered by Nick F 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
theist here and it is not flawed.
2007-01-18 01:37:47 · answer #10 · answered by mullah robertson 4 · 3⤊ 0⤋