English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

For those Evolutionists who don't believe that dinosaurs never lived with man at a time. Well here is physical evidence to suggest they did.

http://www.answersingenesis.org/docs2007/0115angkor.asp

2007-01-17 17:04:47 · 22 answers · asked by A follower of Christ 4 in Society & Culture Religion & Spirituality

Sorry iwa, I won't.

2007-01-17 17:09:20 · update #1

Just to let you know Scott Justice. Evolution doesn't make me fill insecure. Evolution doesn't contredict or disprove the bible if it were true. I am okay with christians who do believe that God used evolution to create man. I'm just trying to challengence Athiest about evolution.

2007-01-17 17:12:47 · update #2

My evidence suggest that dinosours lived alongside with man and this would prove the theory of evolution to be wrong.

2007-01-17 17:14:57 · update #3

birdsflie... your idea that dino's and cave man/woman lived before Adam and Eve is suggesting that evolution is true. Where do you get your facts from.

2007-01-17 17:17:38 · update #4

Josieb, I know dino's existed, there are bone and the bible talks about them in Job 40 and 41.

2007-01-17 17:19:13 · update #5

For those who are suggesting that the pic of the dino is not meant to be a dino. Have another look, look carefully this time and you will see plates on the dino's back. What animal besides a stegosaurus has plates on its back.

2007-01-17 17:25:27 · update #6

22 answers

Good point, friend...there is a wealth of evidence that both humans and dinos existed together.

Evolutionist are always looking for a way to convince themselves of foolish things in spite of evidence to the contrary.

Evolutionists invent all sorts of things as they go along.....everytime something doesn't work out right they invent another theory to keep it current with the latest discovers which keep invalidating their last assumption....it is really laughable
And sadly, convincing themselves is not enough for them. They have to further perpetuate their deceptions by spreading around to our nations youth.

2007-01-17 17:10:38 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1 6

Dude, you've been dipping into the good stuff. How does a sculpture prove anything? That is not what scientists would consider "physical evidence". It would serve you well to do more research on the subject. Would you consider this "physical evidence" of a transitional fossil?
http://www.nsf.gov/news/news_summ.jsp?cntn_id=106807
This is a website devoted to explaining evolution with the bible:
http://www.answersincreation.org/index.htm
Have a nice day!

2007-01-17 17:23:08 · answer #2 · answered by ? 5 · 0 0

OOOOOO, a relief sculpture that may or may not look like something that may or may not be similar to what may or may not be a dinosaur. I'll DEFINATELY re-evaluate my stance on evolution now. Bow down to the great creator, the Flying Spaghetti Mons... Opps, I mean God. Yes, nevermind the scientific method of dating fossil finds by measuring how much earth has accumulated on top of them, nevermind the complete lack of historical evidence (minus that dubious relief of course) of dinosaurs that lived during the building of the Egyptian pyramids, nevermind the lack of any evidence to suggest why they went extinct in a mere 3200 years without leaving any trace of their presence in modern geologic time. Yep, I'm convinced now!

I hope you realize that saying dinosaurs lived 3200 years ago is similar to saying the diameter of the Earth is less than half a mile!

2007-01-17 17:19:54 · answer #3 · answered by Psyleet 3 · 1 0

No modern human knows for sure. Modern humans aren't nearly as smart as they give themselves credit for. Knowledge appears to be infinite. I can say this. In Revelation 13 there is a beast that comes out of the earth and brings fire out of the sky and I can almost guarantee they aren't talking about groundhogs or cave bears. Everyone I meet has heard of the number 666. Everyone gives the same meaning: the devil's number. Noone tells me it is the atomic number of carbon, the backbone of all flesh. I say humans are still living in the dark ages and some will be enlightened and pain is the great teacher. Ecclesiastes 3-18, I think, upholds my interpretaion of 666. It says something along the lines of "I said in my heart, concerning the estate of the sons of men, that god might make it manifest, that they may see, that they themselves are beasts."

2016-03-29 02:42:20 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

AHAHHAHHAHAHAHAHA. And I thought I was brainwashed when I was a christian, but I even knew better at the age of 10. Some people would do anything to try to disprove evolution. Read a damn science book and deal with it, stop being so insecure that evolution will end your religion.

2007-01-17 17:09:00 · answer #5 · answered by Scott Justice 3 · 5 0

Give it up buddy. What about the other animals on that wall they were all just fantasy creatures wasn't they. But what if you did prove man lived with dinosaurs it would mean Genesis was off by millions of years. So what are you trying to prove exactly. OO

2007-01-17 17:19:17 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Friend, I am a Christian & not an evolutionists, But you have some facts mis-understood, Yes, I believe in a Prehistoric world, But those dinosuars did not walk amoung Man, they walked amoung Cavemen & women, of which they were not a Son or Daughter of God, But a upright creature without a soul, Man as we know man started from Adam & Adam & Eve was a Son & Daughter of God they they do have a soul.

2007-01-17 17:11:07 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 2

Okay, so let me see if I understand you.

You assume that because there are bas relief carvings of dinosaur like figures on walls in an ancient city that the people DEFINITELY lived alongside dinosaurs.

So, if one goes and looks at ancient Greek art that depicts centaurs (as shown here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Sebastiano_Ricci_045.jpg ), one would assume that the Greeks were living together with centaurs? No.. (hopefully) one would not leap to that conclusion.

2007-01-17 17:30:59 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous 3 · 0 1

The photo looks like an elephant to me. Even if it does look vaguely like a dinosaur, (VERY vaguely), it doesn't mean much. The stars look like constellations, but that doesn't mean there's a big man with a bow in the sky.

They're reading way too much into that. Real, hard evidence of carbon dating and fossil records unambiguously puts dinosaurs much earlier than humans.

2007-01-17 17:17:43 · answer #9 · answered by STFU Dude 6 · 2 1

Plenty of evidence that humans and dinosaurs co-existed? How long would you and any 3 of your friends last against a Tyrannosaurus equipped with flint spears? Seriously?

2007-01-17 17:14:50 · answer #10 · answered by That Guy 4 · 0 0

OK a few points,

Have you ever heard of minotaurs? Do you think they are real just because somebody drew them.

Also, that looks like a pig to me. That site doesn't give you the option to enlarge the pic and SEE FOR YOURSELF. It just tells you how to interpret the thing. I say it's a pig or a wild boar. There is no indication of scale.

2007-01-17 17:13:48 · answer #11 · answered by mullah robertson 4 · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers