Has there been any evidence found that supports creationism?

Question

...because last I heard everything suggests biological evolution...

Answer 1

No and there isn't any that could, thats why it isn't science.

Answer 2

There are a number of physical and logical ideas that support the idea of God.

One is called the First Cause arguments. Basically in physics, every action requires a cause; cause and effect. Now, since every cause is an action or effect, it must in turn have a cause. You should be able to trace these back infinitely until you arrive at the beginning of the universe. If the universe beginning happened, which we intuitively believe, something had to cause it to begin. But the universe beginning is the first thing that ever happened. The only way to break this paradox is by breaking physical and logical sense, i.e. divine intervention.

Now, for support that the universe did indeed begin, let us consider the idea that it did not. That would mean that time stretches backwards infinitely, which would mean an infinite number of events have happened before now. That would mean an infinite amount of time has passed since one of these events. However, an infinite amount of time cannot pass. Time passed after a certain event is constantly increasing, but still finite.

I also personally refuse to believe that my consciousness could come about due to random mutations and evolution. I don't see how my stream of consciousness could just suddenly stop and never resume.

Answer 3

science cant create life
it has pretty links built up by looks like ,
but it cant make or demonstrate its theory ,just show pretty pictures that they say proove there is evolution.
no real living intermediates nor proven family [related links ]

even if evolution is how god made adam last ,
explain how the first life was begat ,ie dust into life
give me the wild type first creation then make it take its first step into the'next ' evolution.

dont be fooled by science that says every year we got a cure for cancer ,yet still has ever increasing cancer's occuring because other men in white make yet other cancer producing micro fractions from gods dusts ,airs and waters.

science cant do anything but what they get paid to do /say.
isnt it strange the same media that sells us products and lies comes up with the proofs of evolution that we trust science and not god.
look at the science its not fact its looks like.

Answer 4

Get better sources, they are lying to you. The evidences I have found so far, are as follows. The cosmological argument, the teleological argument, the moral argument. Those three, are outside of the bible no less,, oh and some philosophical arguments also. Those lead to the fact there is a god, and are very detailed, but fascinating studies. Once you come to that conclusion, you must decide which God stands up to the tests.....Compare their holy books, compare their prophets, compare the number of manuscripts available, and compare how many prophecies have come true, down to very detailed descriptions. How many have evidenced their prophets sayings, by backing them up with signs and wonders. Look into the cohesiveness of the books, and the eyewitness testimonies, to see if and where they fall apart. Look for inconsistencies. These are just some of the reasons I believe creationism wins out, hands down anyday. The fossil records, for instance, still point to creation, please, seek out good sources. Too much is at stake. Darwinism is really struggling to hold on to any credibility anymore. Don't take my word for it though..and be picky about who you trust and listen to.

Answer 5

There have been a few scientists that have tried to make a good case for it, and can make it appear logical, but most scientists will disagree with them. Real scientists don't use bias in their theories, they use results of hundreds and thousands of tested hypothesis.

Because there is a case for it there will always be people that believe in it, but it is extremly unlikely based on all the knowledge we have and what we see actually happening in the world that refutes it.

Answer 6

"There have been a few scientists that have tried to make a good case for it, and can make it appear logical, but most scientists will disagree with them. Real scientists don't use bias in their theories, they use results of hundreds and thousands of tested hypothesis.

Because there is a case for it there will always be people that believe in it, but it is extremly unlikely based on all the knowledge we have and what we see actually happening in the world that refutes it."

Answer 7

The evidence at http://www.trueorigin.org/ supporting creationism seems interesting.

Answer 8

This site: http://www.halos.com/ claims a viable scientific "young earth" theory based on radioactive decay inside rocks, called "radiohaloes." The research has been called into question by many scientists, but perhaps this is along the lines of what you are asking for? I have only read overviews and reviews calling his methods into serious question.

Answer 9

Yes - there is a lot contrary to popular belief. Darwin himself even doubted his own theory towards the end of his life.

Answer 10

Biological evolution, the string theory, black holes... yup. No creation there, either.

Answer 11

No, creation's been refuted many times, it doesn't deserve to be anything (fact or theory). Evolution has never been refuted, that's why it is a scientific theory.

www.darwinismrefuted.com is the worst creationist propaganda site I've ever seen.
They don't even know a current "theory" is a theory that has never been refuted