Which of these is your approach to ethics?

Question

1. There are certain rights and duties that must be considered in order to know what the ethical choice is. For example, it is wrong to lie. It's your duty to tell the truth, no matter the consequences. People have a right to the truth.

2. What matters is the outcome. If telling the truth hurts someone, then you should lie in that case.

3. It matters more what kind of person you are than just what you do in a particular situation. You want to be the kind of person who is truthful, for example.

4. What matters is the intention of the person.

5. Some other system of ethics!

Answer 1

There is only one measure you need to make ethical choices - does this act contain Love?

For instance, if your wife pours her heart into making a dinner that tastes awful but you tell her it's the most wonderful thing you've ever eaten, you would call that unethical per your rule #1. I would say that is a Love based act and is therefore in accordance with God's only measuring stick - Love.

Answer 2

5

Answer 3

It is impossible for anyone to tell the absolute truth all the time in every situation. In other words, never lie no matter how hard we may try and advocate being truthful. So I would say it would have to depend on the reason for deception, the weight or impact of the outcome, and the intentions of the person in question. So I would have to go with all of the above!

Answer 4

Intention and duty are a matter of definition. For instance, the 9/11 attacks can be defined as murder (by the victims) or as following the will of god (by the perpetrators). The kind of person you are is somewhat defined by the larger set of what you do in particular situations, especially habitually. It is impossible to create a rule based system of ethics, since ethics encompasses all that is possible for a human mind to encounter, and thus would have to encompass the mind. (1) I tend to follow a principle of care, tempered by a sense eof dispassionate fairness.

Answer 5

5. My system of ethics is a combination of "do unto others" and "harm none." Telling the truth absolutely, with no qualifications, can lead to hurting a lot of people. In that case, I'd prefer someone say nothing at all.

Answer 6

Number 1, 2, 3, and 4. I don't want to let truth hurt someone. But I don't want to lie either.

Answer 7

I follow all of them, I've only lied a few times in life as a child.
Sometimes I say nothing at all if it's going to hurt a person, also I'll tell a person something good before the bad.

Answer 8

3. I want to be truthful as much as possible, but if a better outcome would result from me lying, I might lie depending on the situation.

Answer 9

Always tell the truth regardless of the outcome. Never lie, people are resilient, and can bounce back from hurtful truths. And you will always be known as a person of your word, honest and loyal.

Answer 10

properly you're spectacular it is not. Utilitarianism is a style of humanism. In humanism in spite of if something is solid or undesirable relies upon on the way it impacts human beings. The religious attitude to ethics on the different hand isn't approximately how what you're doing impacts human beings yet approximately in spite of if an invisible being approves or disapproves of your strikes. religious morality is a style of authoritarianism: God stated X is solid hence it is so regardless of the way it impacts human beings. you may likely tell from my selection of words which i for my area think of makes greater experience.