Should religious groups have tax-free status for the property they own, purchase, etc.?

Question

Why or why not?

(This question especially goes out to you Put - Prayer - In - Schools - Because - Separation - of - Church - and - State - is - Just - Wrong people, as I am very curious as to what you think.)

Personally, I don't think they should have tax-exempt status, but that's just moi.

Answer 1

In my views they should NOT be tax exempt...they are big ( I mean billions of $ and more) money laundry gamesters and the tax payers blindly contribute to this rip off. The church's far exceed many countries in income and assets.

Answer 2

They absolutely positively should retain their current tax- exempt status
Not all religious groups are super -rich and extremely well funded organizations , some are barely getting by and a tax may very well drive them out of existence.
there are also groups especially in rural areas that do a lot of good for their community and taxing them would cause hardship to those they serve by deferring money into government coffers rather than into soup kitchens and food banks. The government doesn't need it, the hungry do
i have just expained the humanitarian reason for not taxing religion now for the political reason.
Not taxing religion in effect robs that religion of power. It completely negates the argument of
a tax payer demanding services and considerations from the government for monies paid out.
Denying power to the Church is one of the tacitly understood objectives of the US Constitution. The Founding fathers wanted a weak Church and not taxing them was one way to do it.

Answer 3

They actual actually ought to hold their present day tax- exempt status not all religious communities are large -wealthy and relatively properly funded businesses , some are extremely getting by using and a tax might okcontinual them out of life. there are additionally communities fantastically in rural factors that do assorted solid for his or her community and taxing them could reason difficulty to those they serve by using deferring money into government coffers particularly than into soup kitchens and food banks. the government would not choose it, the hungry do I even have purely expained the humanitarian rationalization for not taxing faith now for the political reason. not taxing faith in result robs that faith of potential. It thoroughly negates the argument of a tax payer stressful centers and issues from the government for monies paid out. Denying potential to the Church is fairly certainly one of the tacitly understood objectives of the US shape. The Founding fathers wanted a vulnerable Church and not taxing them exchange into one thank you to do it.

Answer 4

The question is not whether they should, but what Christ said to do. He said to pay the taxes and not be concerned with what the governments of the world are doing to each other. Instead, religions don't pay the taxes and get involved in politics. All except one, of course.

Answer 5

personally if they want a tax-free status then they should not be able to influence what gets taught,or spoken, plus they should be able to have anything from their books on public display.
they rely on their followers to pay for things like a new church and stuff like bla bal bla

Answer 6

Yes we should have tax-exempt status. In spite of the nice homes, nice cars, and whatever you see ministers such as myself with, what you fail to realize is that we give 10 times as much back to the communities and poor families. There's a lot behind the scene that you may never know.

Answer 7

Of course not. Americans give way to much to freedom of speech. Furthermore, this discriminates against atheists and agnostics.

To be tax free, I'd pretend to be a Christian!

Answer 8

I don't think they should be tax exempt. Give unto Caesar that which is Caesar's.

Answer 9

No, just the Native Americans. the country WAS stolen, as everyone else very well knows.

Answer 10

we dont know your religion so we have to say No