2007-01-17 08:54:13 · 16 answers · asked by Octavio 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Military
YES! We are already there and need to get the job done instead of leaving half finished and then waiting for terrorists to come to our home front.
Smart way to do that is by sending more troops so that it can get done faster.
2007-01-17 08:59:55 · answer #1 · answered by lc 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Wow...I'm pleasantly surprised with the "yes" responses. Unlike some people running for office with short-term memory loss, I can still remember supporting this war when it began. Failure cannot be an option. If it takes more troops to finish the job, send more troops.
2007-01-17 09:08:19 · answer #2 · answered by Answer Master Dude 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
NO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! But if so many people have answered yes to this question then I am sure My Husband and many more of our family members who are being taken from there homes and sent to Iraq, who are not even in the army for deployment for what may 1st be an order of 6 months and turn into an order for 18 months would really appreciate if you would all volunteer to go instead of them since you feel so strongly about supporting your president whom is sending them over there for a senseless issue we will all appreciate it I am so sure the mothers fathers children and families of the over Three Thousand SAILORS would! So go find out where you can sign up the list surely isn't on Yahoo Answers!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
2007-01-17 10:31:48 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Only if Bush is serious about securing liberty for the Iraqis like why couldn't he figure out more troops were needed 130,000 lives ago when most of US could see by the lack of back-up for US & Allied forces.
2007-01-17 09:11:17 · answer #4 · answered by spareo1 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
a reliable no and a hell no!!! Our nice men and women folk of the military are going over there to be cannon fodder and referee a state-of-the-paintings civil conflict. He might want to be sending them because he quite "grew" an ethical experience and feels accountable about attacking a u . s . a . that did not have some thing to do with the attack on us and has as a effect made the human beings aims of their own homes. moral experience, what stinking moral experience. He needs to deliver them over there to freshen up the mess he created even as nonetheless attempting to preserve a good position in historic past for himself. To hell with what number bodies he has to throw in there. it truly is a guy who stated in an interview 9/20/06 that this complete Iraq ingredient will only be a comma in historic past.
2016-11-24 23:50:21 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Although we should have had the brunt force of servicemen and women overseas at the begining and not at this stage in the war, yes I do support him sending more over. There is a job to be done, and we need to hurry up and get it done.
2007-01-17 09:03:14 · answer #6 · answered by deftonehead778 4 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Absolutely
2007-01-17 09:02:44 · answer #7 · answered by Ibredd 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Yes,
Remember all the politicians want more police forces in the street to cut down Violence.
2007-01-17 09:13:38 · answer #8 · answered by Quickie 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
yes, but only as a last chance at a final push to help the Iraqi gov. get it together.
2007-01-17 09:00:07 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Yes.
2007-01-17 08:59:19 · answer #10 · answered by Doc 7 · 3⤊ 0⤋