Why isn't the intelligent design hypothesis intelligently designed?

Answer 1

You have to remember which group of people created that hypothesis.

Answer 2

It's a long going debate that reaches into most peoples basic beliefs, but intelligent design is almost common sense, whether you believe that God was the originator or that it was an alien. Life on this planet is so intricately woven and had to have been nutured for so long through so many extiction level catastrophes that without something to help nothing would probably exist on this planet.
On a another note, from a biological & technological perspective we are not that far away ourselves from being able to put/create life on a another planet, so the idea of God doing it in 6 days or whatever your belief may be, yeah that's not very difficult to believe.

Answer 3

Because it is based on a book written by god through the use of man. Let's assume that to be a fact. Isn't it kind of like the telephone game? Someone starts by whispering something into your ear. Then based on clarity of voice and personal experience, you interpret what you think you heard. By the time it gets around the room, the message is so utterly skewed.

So assuming that there is a god and he whispered into the ear of man and told him what to write in his book, how do we know that he copied ver batem? How do we know which parts are god's actual words, and which are parts added by man for a little pizazz?

When the only "evidence" and corroboration of said "evidence" of this hypothesis (thank you for not incorrectly calling it a theory) is from a book whose actual author(s) and motives are questionable then you are left with something that is not intelligently designed.

Answer 4

Because it is being sold as a scientific idea, when it is not based on any science. Science is using the facts to find the answer, intelligent design is coming up with an answer and finding facts that support it.
Like Spontaneous Combustion. Start with the answer and work backwords...

Answer 5

check Case for a Creator: Lee Strobel

He talks to many scientists about whether the universe is designed. The one that struck me hardest was all the conditions that must be met to keep life going. Humans can barely build a working Biosphere, and yet somehow nothing created this MASSIVE biosphere we call earth. I don't see how anyone can think that someone didn't create this place.

Answer 6

Or the design itself, there are a lot of errors in the human body alone, like having the same pipe for solids and air. I'll admit I sure couldn't design a better universe, but I'm not God.

Answer 7

Creationism is pretty much shot down by Genesis itself. Cain left Eden and went to Nod and found a wife.

I think that God may have been the big bang. Certainly not a shred of proof of that though.

Answer 8

that is worse than in basic terms dogma. that is dogma that Christians have feebly tried to cover as technology using 1/2-truths, unsuitable good judgment, and unsupportable assumptions. If Biblical Creationism is shown reality, then one ought to ask your self why they have lengthy gone to such lengths to dress it up as a clinical concept somewhat of in basic terms certainly offering it because it stands... because the in basic terms right reality that is meant to be? perchance that is because all and diverse is turning out to be too knowledgeable and state-of-the-artwork to save procuring into millenia-previous superstitions to respond to each of the vast questions.

Answer 9

Such an hypothesis would be too complex, and would take an intelligence beyond that availible to humanity.

Answer 10

Because it's all a matter of hypothesising the guesses that the world was actually the result of evolution and not creation, and you'll get the palindromic version of this.