I don't know that they are short. However, this website tells what is considered perfect proportions. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Body_proportions
2007-01-17 07:57:43
·
answer #1
·
answered by grl 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Where are you measuring? I'm 5ft2 and my legs are 32 inches to the top of the outer thigh and 29 inches to the top of the inner thigh. Your legs seem extremely long for your height!
HTH : )
2007-01-17 10:07:48
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I think you measured wrong cause I'm 5'4(163 cm) and my legs are about 32.5 inches long and they're considered pretty long. So there is no way that your legs could be that length at your height.
2007-01-17 08:36:18
·
answer #3
·
answered by screw-over-311 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
Where are you measuring from? Most women of 5ft1 would have 28-29inch inside leg measurement, sometimes less. Men tend to have even shorter legs proportionally.
2007-01-17 09:28:25
·
answer #4
·
answered by wicket 2
·
2⤊
0⤋
no it sounds in the avarage to me
i'm 5 1 too and my legs are shorter than that
2007-01-17 07:54:54
·
answer #5
·
answered by piratesofmaddness 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
the ratio of legs are 60% of the total height so you don't have short legs.
2007-01-18 01:59:44
·
answer #6
·
answered by rulethisworldman 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
you sound like your more legs than anything lol. im 5'3 and have 32 inch legs and i thought i was normal height LOL.
2007-01-17 07:56:07
·
answer #7
·
answered by daffysmiles2000 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
I Think so Its Fine, As it is u dont wanna walk on Desert so its fine
2007-01-17 07:54:18
·
answer #8
·
answered by blueblood 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
no I'm pretty sure they are long, they are almost 3 feet and that is over half your height.
2007-01-17 07:56:06
·
answer #9
·
answered by ssoccerstars 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
No. Actually, your legs are freakishly long....you sure you measured that right???
2007-01-17 07:54:52
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
5⤊
0⤋