2007-01-17 06:16:26 · 14 answers · asked by lowroad 2 in Family & Relationships ➔ Singles & Dating
I would rather not know than know. So to me not knowing is nto relevant in my everyday life. I let it all happen as it is planned. So whether I am going to get best answer for this particular question in four hours today is best left unknown.
2007-01-17 06:21:52 · answer #1 · answered by Avie 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Would you like the sarcastic answer or a serious one?
Sarcastic: When you're eating lunch at the hot dog cart down the block and wondering... what exactly do they put in this? Importance? You actually make it to the end of the day without puking.
Serious: Knowing exactly what your purpose is/the future.
Importance: If you knew exactly why you were here, or why you were meant to be walking your dog at 5:30 am and it's f***ing cold, and you're wearing slippers and no socks. You wouldn't be living, and present. If you knew your purpose, and what was meant to happen... there would be no reason to live.
2007-01-17 06:22:21 · answer #2 · answered by Dayton S 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
wow, that is a very thought provoking question, so open- ended.
i believe there needs to be a good balance, sometimes you need to understand that its alright to learn things while not knowing, afterwards you know how things like that go. when your young you spend most of your adolescene not knowing, as you grow you know more based on life experience. but if you spent your life knowing how it was going to all turn out, life wouldn't be that exciting.
thanks for getting me thinking.
2007-01-17 06:22:51 · answer #3 · answered by Fran Y 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Well, for example, i might have to do an operation soon...in my case, i'd rather not know the details of what the doctors will do during the operation....so, not knowing for me would be much better than knowing...knowing what they would do would just scare me and depress me...so, i'd rather get iot done without knowing what they will do in extreme detail...
2007-01-17 06:24:39 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
It depends on the individual and what's important to them.
2007-01-17 06:22:39 · answer #5 · answered by Belle 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
To put it simply, "not knowing" is better when it's something out of your control and you can't do anything about it. Why "know" it then. It will only hurt.
2007-01-17 06:20:57 · answer #6 · answered by cynthiajean222 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Not knowing you have cancer is better than knowing. Not knowing you are about to get hit by a semi is better than knowing. Perhaps I misunderstand?
2007-01-17 06:19:47 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
To know is something. To know that you know is better. But to know that you do not know is the beginning of real knowledge. Know what I mean?
2007-01-17 06:30:01 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
In those moments when you can let your imagination run wild and just see what gives without doing anything to control it.
2007-01-17 09:43:00 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Like when your grandmother tells you about the time she found a fish hook in her panties, some things are better off not knowing!
Muah!
2007-01-17 09:16:21 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋