What do you think of this belief? (Warning, there is English faults)
1. Existence has a substance. This substance is the existence itself. Substance constitutes a force pushing the existence to exist
2. The universe, its space-time as well as its energy-matter are logical continuity and extension of this existence
3. The Purpose of existence is to exist and be simply
4. The way allowing attaining this purpose is that of the global blossoming of all existence
5. So, the existence scatters across time and space composing billions of billion of individual conscience.
6. All those consciences will migrate and transmigrate in corporal envelopes on Earth as on other planets across the space and time
7. Here low, they will live each various experience of life developing a personal improvement!
8. On the death of the corporal envelope, conscience will leave this last to go back towards existence
9. The Existence will absorb conscience as well as its personal improvement
10. If conscience is improved enough, so it will merge with existence. If need be, it will transmigrate on a planet in a new corporal envelope for continue its personal development.
11. The blossoming finally acquired, conscience will merge with existence and will do one with this last
12. This fusion will enrich existence in its global blossoming and will assure it of its continuity
13. It will scatter one more time forming billions of billion new consciences which will follow the same way
14. All this composes an existential cycle, endless, going beyond space and time
2007-01-17 06:11:06 · 7 answers · asked by Las Vegas 007 5 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
I think it's an interesting set of statements. You are right about the use of English however; if you clean up your grammar a bit you will make your ideas more accessible to others. Then you'll probably get a better range of critical evaluation. Good luck!
2007-01-20 03:43:46 · answer #1 · answered by Im_So_Confused 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Interesting. The belief sounds highly unlikely.
2007-01-17 14:23:36 · answer #2 · answered by Soul saviour 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I think that the "belief" described above uses a multitude of words with indefinite or ambigious meanings.
Without a clear definition of your terms, the belief is meaningless to anyone but yourself.
2007-01-17 14:18:09 · answer #3 · answered by Aeryn Whitley 3 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Hindu, Buddhist, Taoist, Plato. What's new?
2007-01-17 14:17:31 · answer #4 · answered by neil s 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
er could you repeat that
2007-01-17 14:17:16 · answer #5 · answered by zed10096 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
You are not only redundant, you are boring.
2007-01-17 14:23:51 · answer #6 · answered by MrsOcultyThomas 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
I'm dizzy...
2007-01-17 14:22:45 · answer #7 · answered by M'lady 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋