If the Saudi's send troops to protect only the Sunni's how will the US troops respond? Do we side with the Shiites & Kurds and completely divide up the country creating more civil violence in the nation we are trying to stabilize and rebuild?
I feel bad for the guys on the ground if this should happen although I may be out there again so I'm a bit concerned how this unfolds.
2007-01-17 06:07:12 · 11 answers · asked by anthony 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Military
No matter what happens, the US position with the Saudis will remain the same: bent over.
2007-01-17 06:25:11 · answer #1 · answered by Hemingway 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Well, it would certainly make things difficult, and an unwelcome twist. It would be far easier to just resettle the Sunni's to Saudi. Or divide up Baghdad like Berlin was in the cold war. Anything to keep the Sunni's from harassing their neigbors with bombs would be a plus. If Saudi wants to control the Sunni population, let them. But they must not allow for sectarian viloence if they do, and must fall under the supervision of the area commander. Other wise, we'll be having firefights with the Saudi's as well.
2007-01-17 06:20:07 · answer #2 · answered by Shawn M 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
not in my opinion. a solid sufficient reason is the employer of an excellent democratic government. regrettably, the type wherein we are doing this construction will purely bring about yet yet another American equipped government foreign places that hates us. "Destroying Islamic totalitarianism demands a punishing protection rigidity onslaught to end its wide-unfold state representative and demoralize its supporters. we ought to installation all necessary rigidity to wreck Iran's means to combat, mutually as minimizing our very own casualties. we want a marketing campaign that ruthlessly inflicts the discomfort of conflict so intensely that the jihadists resign their reason as hopeless and worry to soak up hands against us. it fairly is how u.s. and its Allies defeated the two Nazi Germany and Imperialist Japan." we can't be referee to those human beings. they are going to in no way fall in step with western innovations as to a thank you to settle changes so the perfect approach, being as we can't purely shy away and need they gained't hassle us is to rigidity a submission by using protection rigidity potential. The Sunni and Shiite tribes have been battling one yet another for some years, i don't anticipate it to end each time quickly till it is compelled to a halt. Iran and the UAE are in the back of the conflict. initiate with the basis of the subject particularly than addressing the indications.
2016-10-31 09:08:01 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Don't get fooled, Saudi Arabia has for long been financing terrorist groups, don't forget that the Twin Towers were brought down by Saudi Arabian terrorists whose education in flying planes was paid by their dear country, that also happens to be our dearest Arab ally, (remain assured that Saudi Arabia has an invisible finger helping the Sunnis in Iraq).
2007-01-17 06:22:25 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Saudi Arabia is not one of the more foolish nations in the Middle East. If they did that, it would be as part of the Coalition providing security for the people of Iraq.
I see no reason to take issue with their choosing the region they wish to secure.
2007-01-17 06:20:08 · answer #5 · answered by JanieDee 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Attack the Saudi troops and run them out, by law until Iraq is either able to take over their own security of they ask us to leave we are obligated by law to defend their territory.
2007-01-17 20:23:18 · answer #6 · answered by firetdriver_99 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I am sure the United States will vigorously protest Saudi Arabi, Saudi Arabia, or any other country that would invade Iraq without provocation.
The US simply does not believe any country should invade a sovereign nation that was not a direct threat to the invading country.
Oh, wait a minute.................................................. never mind.
2007-01-17 06:17:48 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Troops will not support that, as they will act here as neutral in between shia's and sunni's and try to give some strength to political process for heading towards normalization.
2007-01-17 06:17:40 · answer #8 · answered by sandy71 1 · 1⤊ 0⤋
We are not supposed to side with them. We are actually supposed to encourage more middle eastern nations to help out with stabilizin Iraq.
2007-01-17 06:15:02 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Ask Bush. On second thought, he has no plans for anything. Never has, never will. We are at the mercy of his stupidity.
2007-01-17 06:12:04 · answer #10 · answered by notyou311 7 · 2⤊ 2⤋