If it happens, the invasion of Iran will likely occur next year (Pres. Bush's last year in office). Take a good look at Iraq and superimpose that image onto Iran for a good idea of the aftermath.
Nukes will probably only be used in response to an NBC (nuclear-biological-chemical) counterattack.
2007-01-17 04:18:09
·
answer #1
·
answered by Andy 4
·
0⤊
2⤋
"when will usa will invade iran ?"
Who knows, maybe soon, maybe never
"what will heppen after that ?"
Again, your guess is as good as mine
"will usa use nuclear bombs"
I would doubt it. Last time one was used was over 50 years ago, and coincidentally it was also the first time they were used. Now a lot of nations have them, and they've always been viewed as a last resort. A pre-emptive nuclear strike by the US would be a disaster, our image as America would change overnight.
2007-01-17 04:14:09
·
answer #2
·
answered by Pfo 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
I desire a protection stress professional might want to address this question. yet considering i'm sitting the following no longer believing those solutions, i will provide it a shot. once you've been following protection stress comments heavily in any respect, you want to maintain in mind that the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq have heavily depleted our troop provide and our weaponry. There are lower back orders on totally armored Humvees for Iraq which could no longer somewhat filled till this summer season. in short we are in no position to invade absolutely everyone. somewhat, we are extraordinarily weakened and our ability to preserve ourselves in case of a serious protection stress attack is in question. All this as hence of struggling with Iraq and Afghanistan. Iran isn't any Iraq or Afghanistan. For starters, get out a map and seem at it somewhat frustrating. Iran is more effective or less 5 cases the length of Iraq. And Iran has about 3 cases the inhabitants of Iraq. And Iran curiously does have guns of mass destruction it would want to likely use to maintain its existence. To sum up, what's there about our adventure so some distance that makes you imagine we are in a position and prepared to invade a much more effective ambitious enemy than Iraq ever became? And bombing? did not "wonder and awe" coach the obstacles of that technique? undergo in ideas: the first evening of the conflict we did not hit between the traditional objectives we were going after. Drop nukes? we've were given international conflict III on our fingers, and we're not waiting for it any further. no longer to point that all and diverse this can value more effective thousands of billions of bucks--finally breaking the U.S. monetary gadget faster or later. that is a robust concern that cooler heads are prevailing someplace.
2016-10-15 08:54:45
·
answer #3
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
DON'T BE SO FOOLISH. The US got it's as s kicked in Vietnam, it's having major problems in Iraq. If the US goes nuclear, it will be the end of the planet. The US has very few allies left, that move would loose them. China and Russia would be a bit upset. And what has Iran done anyway. The Pres. of Iran is merely a figurehead and does not even have the support of the people. On the other hand, if Bush is, as many have implied, Empire building, and being the idiot that he is, he may try something. But I really think the American people are to intelligent to let him get to far with it.
2007-01-17 04:37:41
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
2⤋
If you listen to the very superficial reporting in the news media - you would get this impression.
However if you pay close attention to the things we have actually done - you would notice that we are following a containment policy not a policy of military confrontation. For example we have been carefully neutralizing Iran's offensive military capabilities (the recent deployment of Patriot missiles is an example) while using financial sanctions to reduce Iran's ability to pay for a nuclear weapons program.
And the fact that President Bush has carefully committed us to nothing regarding Iran is keeping everybody guessing. As a result we get all the advantages of the rumors and speculation of military action without having to actually take any military action. (And still be able to honestly state that we have never threatened Iran!)
2007-01-17 06:15:57
·
answer #5
·
answered by MikeGolf 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
Washington will launch a military strike on Iran before April 2007, say sources. The attack will be launched from the sea and Patriot missiles will guard all oil-producing countries in the region, they add. Recent statements emanating from the United States indicate the Bush administration's new strategy for Iraq doesn't include any proposal to make a compromise or negotiate with Syria or Iran. A reliable source said President Bush recently held a meeting with Vice President Dick Cheney, Defense Secretary Robert Gates, Secretary of State Dr Condoleezza Rice and other assistants in the White House where they discussed the plan to attack Iran in minute detail.
2007-01-17 04:15:43
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
2⤋
The US cant invade iran. china will not let them as it will destabilise the entire region. China holds huge amounts of US dollars and could call them in at once and blow the US economy. Also they've got the largest standing army/airforce etc so I dont think the US would dare.
the biggest worry is israel going it alone. they have consistently ignored UN resolutions before and have no qualms about acting unilateraly with or without the blessing of the US if they feel Israel's threatened.
2007-01-17 04:18:03
·
answer #7
·
answered by Pilgrim 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
I dont think so. Currently,they do not have the manpower to do an Iraq style invasion/occupation. They can do pre-emptive strikes with the objective of weakening, not destroying Iran. No nukes either. Outcome, look at Iraq in 1991.
2007-01-18 20:09:35
·
answer #8
·
answered by Giantbutthole 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Iran as I see them are like the Islamic militants who will not
hesitate to blow up the whole world just to show that they can.
A nuclear weapon in their hand is like giving a machine gun as
a toy to a seven year old child. Invasion of Iran is a necessity
when dialogues fail. Time is running out and hopefully Iran will
come to their senses and stop trying to be top dog of the Islamic
world before it is too late like in Saddam's case. After the invasion
is anybody's guess.
2007-01-17 14:39:15
·
answer #9
·
answered by CAPTAIN BEAR 6
·
0⤊
1⤋
First of all. The US gave Iraq 12 years and 17 chances (UN Resolutions) before invading.
I don't think Iran has come close to that point yet.
You might see an Israeli strategic air attack on Iranian nuclear facilities before the US even comes close to invading.
2007-01-17 04:13:58
·
answer #10
·
answered by ? 6
·
3⤊
1⤋