English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

reprocussions of married officer having sexual relationship with lower enlisted E-3. starting in a wartime situation and continuing upon return.relations carried on in place of work and other lower enlisted have knowledge of it, but dont feel comfortable coming forward because of officer rank.

2007-01-17 03:05:29 · 9 answers · asked by curious 1 in Politics & Government Military

9 answers

It will come out, someone will report it.

2007-01-17 03:09:04 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Both fraternization and adultery are punishable under Article 134 of the UCMJ (uniform code of military justice). Fraternization, for example, is punishable by loss in rank/pay and up to two years confinement. The thing about fraternization is that the court martial does not need to prove sexual intercourse, just that the officer (male or female) socialized improperly with an enlisted (male or female).

Of course, none of this will happen unless the command organization knows of the violations under Article 134. While I was in the Navy, we had an ombudsman who enlisteds and officers alike could talk to in complete anonymity.

That avenue was frequently used by enlisteds to complain about officer conduct...including, sometimes, the commanding officer. And the complainant was totally protected by confidentiality.

2007-01-17 03:21:43 · answer #2 · answered by oldprof 7 · 1 0

Clear case of fraternization. Adultery is also a crime in the Military, regardless of rank. If the person is an E-3, most likely they could get a reduction in rank, possibly face a discharge.
The officer will get raked over the coals, especially since it's a junior enlisted member.
If people are afrail, they should contect their local EEO office and they will take it from there.

2007-01-17 03:17:49 · answer #3 · answered by Colonel 6 · 1 0

that would be found out long before they got home. stuff like that is always reported, that officer would lose rank and pay be restricted meaning no liberty. extra duty and possibly a dishonorable discharge for fraternization the lower enlisted would also be punished just not as harshly. the officer is older and knows better and yes this would be reported to his wife at home since she would be losing pay for his stupidity

2007-01-17 03:18:55 · answer #4 · answered by kleighs mommy 7 · 0 0

Coming forward for the right thing would of course be the right thing, but I certainly understand the uncomfort. There are unwritten codes amongst the military. Before making a decision on this, just remember what happened to the soldier spilled the beans about the Iraqi prisoner treatment. He can't even move back to his hometown.

2007-01-17 03:18:49 · answer #5 · answered by Lettie D 7 · 1 0

If you know that, something is true. Then, be truthful.
If all that you think you know is based on speculation and rumors, then do not be a part of it. You are free to respect the privacy of others or if you experience negative circumstances due to the preferential treatment of someone else--report it.
The UCMJ covers actions unbecoming an officer and adultery.
Stay positive.

2007-01-17 03:16:59 · answer #6 · answered by FunkyMcNasty 3 · 1 0

I'm not sure what your question is, but yeah, officers aren't supposed to do that. The violation is similar to fraternization.

2007-01-17 03:14:31 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Contact the IG. They will look into the matter and protect your identity.

2007-01-17 04:54:48 · answer #8 · answered by MikeGolf 7 · 0 0

He will be dishonorably discharged. Almost no question.

2007-01-17 03:10:56 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers