Atheists should be called the educated and the theists the wilfully ignorant, and it's not merely a matter of facts or evidence.
The deplorable spelling and grammar of "bungyow", "SeeTheLight", and other godbots proves the point.
.
2007-01-17 00:14:30
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋
Though atheists don't need more faith than theists, it must be noted that atheists do not believe there is a God. This is different from believing there is no God.
It is not a denial of God because they know there is no God. It is a denial of God because there is not enough valid, empirical evidence to prove that he exists.
Atheists should therefore be called, "The Skeptical".
2007-01-17 08:13:44
·
answer #2
·
answered by Chris W 2
·
4⤊
1⤋
WHAT EXACTLY ARE THEISTS FAITHFUL TO. They can't even agree on a name or if it is one, many or comes as a loose collection of separate parts.
2007-01-17 08:14:42
·
answer #3
·
answered by U-98 6
·
1⤊
2⤋
Of course not. If I read you right you're attempting to imply that atheism is based on proof, which is an absurdity.
2007-01-17 08:11:37
·
answer #4
·
answered by cmw 6
·
3⤊
1⤋
i see. every people may be faithful in his work or profession or artistry etc and he may be proofful.but not in other fields or forms of wisdoms.
2007-01-17 08:09:08
·
answer #5
·
answered by katagalugan9 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Usually through history its been infidel. Whatever.
2007-01-17 08:08:56
·
answer #6
·
answered by fourmorebeers 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
Non-believers must have a lot more faith to believe that there is no God than believers. Believers have also proof, but your faith needs to start from somewhere. One way or to another.
2007-01-17 08:10:05
·
answer #7
·
answered by SeeTheLight 7
·
2⤊
7⤋
I prefer "The Free".
2007-01-17 08:12:26
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
1⤋
Okay, it's enough now.
2007-01-17 08:08:51
·
answer #9
·
answered by XYZ 7
·
1⤊
1⤋
"Full of proof"?
...of what?
2007-01-17 08:19:18
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋