I'm not sure witch one. I know the main syptom is intellectual laziness and the inability to see reality and thier surroundings. If its an illness than it should be able to be cured. If its a deficiancy than its genetic and cannot be cured without gene therapy. What do you think.
2007-01-16 22:33:42 · 9 answers · asked by Tropical Weasel 3 in Travel ➔ Italy ➔ Bologna
Two quick points....
#1. Spelling/proper language trivia is is for the mentally deficiant. The inability to have free thought limits you to structered/repeditave exersizes. Like repeditivly putting nuts and bolts together. Its simple but satisfyes your mind.
#2. Cons support stem cell reaserch. Libs are aginst stem cell research. Dems support fetal (baby grinding) research which has shown no promise of success and voted down adult and cord blood research which has many successes and show even more promise. The libs are only interested in baby grinding....shame on them. They have no interest in curing desease.
2007-01-16 23:54:59 · update #1
#3. I’m glad to see the usual ignorant who don’t know the difference between intelligence and repetitive memorization. They are the ones who use their savant abnormalities to divert attention from the fact that they don’t have a point, or facts to back their point.
2007-01-17 03:26:51 · update #2
It is neither.They are simply programed from birth.Through public schools where the Liberal view is predominant to the TV and movies they watch. In the higher population areas they never get the opportunity to think for themselves so fewer break the programming. In a hive things such as independence and integrity are traded for going with the flow and saying what ever people want to hear.Because they are so closely packed they reinforce the fallacies and are totally dependent on government structure.Experimentation on laboratory rats prove that personalities alter in overcrowded conditions the rats start exhibiting aberrant behavior.
2007-01-16 22:52:19 · answer #1 · answered by ? 6 · 2⤊ 1⤋
You shall be delegated to the ignorant portion of the room.
Intellectual laziness includes not using spell check to make sure you don't appear stupid. First impressions count here. If you expect the question to be taken seriously as a well thought out argument- pro or con- regarding an issue, you would be well advised not to prove yourself mentally deficient at the outset. After reading your "question", it is obvious you are only interested in baiting others and deserve no reply other than to point out your own laziness and the mean-spiritedness of your query.
2007-01-17 00:14:08 · answer #2 · answered by Slimsmom 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Well this is a couple of ideals to get you began. #one million. War makes no sense and useless towards an ideology. #two. Iraq had not anything to do with nine/eleven. Saddam and OBL had been on no account peers or cohorts making plans assaults in combination. Iraq posed NO danger to the U.S.. In truth Iraq used to be an best friend of the U.S. for a long time and far in their meant guns of mass destruction which became out to be chemical guns they bought from the U.S.. #three. We are a country of immigrants. Anyone who is not a Native American Indian is a descendant of an immigrant. American organizations are baiting humans from Mexico to come back right here and the federal government allows for it and is helping the firms do it. #four. President Bush mentioned our Mission used to be Accomplished May one million, 2003. The troops must were coming dwelling by way of the tens of hundreds of thousands May two, 2003. I consider that the U.S. does NOT want even one million everlasting U.S. navy base in Iraq or in some other nation of the arena, particularly frankly! WE ARE NOT THE WORLD POLICE!!! And ultimately the richest nation on the planet must be ready to be certain that EVERY LAST AMERICAN will have each and every clinical want met!!! This is simply the starting for me of being a liberal! There are many different points and ideals to it. Essentially for me it boils right down to the indivdual humans being extra foremost than organizations and the federal government is meant to be a consultant of the humans, by way of the humans, and FOR the humans!! Not themselves and the wealthiest amongst us!
2016-09-07 21:13:49 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think you should try that thing called spell check for starters. Gene therapy? Sorry to inform you but the republicans are notorious for trying to put science back into the bottle, see stem cell research. I'm sure the republicans are overwhelmed with joy having an intellectual like you representing them. Keep up the good work.
2007-01-16 23:21:47 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Intellectual laziness? YOU are accusing the liberals of that?
Let me point out a few items of your intellectual superiority:
witch? Surely you meant which
thier? Did you mean their?
than? Shouldn't it be then?
deficiancy? deficiency you mean
I would not go so far as accusing liberals for intellectual laziness when you yourself are too lazy to even use proper language!
2007-01-16 22:55:53 · answer #5 · answered by emiliosailez 6 · 2⤊ 2⤋
It is lack of practical world experience.
Most liberals get more conservative as they get older and learn more about how the world really works.
2007-01-16 22:39:39 · answer #6 · answered by castlekeepr 4 · 1⤊ 2⤋
I agree with emiliosai.And liberalism is a choice and choice is what it is all about.
2007-01-16 23:10:54 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
It's a very tough call. Perhaps it's both?
2007-01-16 22:36:46 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
Whatever,but what is your excuse ?
2007-01-16 23:03:03 · answer #9 · answered by willow, the yodakitty from hell 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋