Bush is an idiot. He is a mass murderer and so are the bunch of thugs known as terrorists/Islamic fundamentalists.
2007-01-16 22:19:56
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
5⤋
Before answering this question, I have to say that I'm not a Republican myself..
But u know wat...I still support President Bush for his decision over Iraq... Honestly I can't consider why can't u think about the innocent lives at WTC?? Did they make something wrong or r they really supposed to die, may I ask??
Human life is not something to play with..I completely agreed..but simply I consider his mission is not completely fruitless.. May I ask could u possibly think of how many innocent lives will end if Suddam is still alive and in power??
And u said that Iraqis are in danger... Here I just wanna ask one more question...Was that not so even when Saddam had power in his a.s.s?? And u said that the instability caused 30000+ Iraqis died...( u mean that Iraq is in instability conditions) Then here is the additional question for u.... Could u plz point out one nation which was founded without blood, instability conditions and bitterness?? I honestly think that u thought too much about man power...we can't simply build Developed and Peaceful Nation in 1 YEAR...NOT IN 10 YEARS... It will be step by step developed...It's only the first stage...Serious why do u want to blame someone so early...??
As for ur additional question.... I may say that some lives are important and vital whereas some are useless ( in my opinion ).. For example...Seriously..do u think that saddam's life is momentous and meaningful for u?
2007-01-16 22:39:04
·
answer #2
·
answered by Blue P 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
It's Saddam, OK? The UN estimates just over 34,000 Iraqis in the last year. Oh, the report didn't state "innocent", just Iraqi's as there wasn't any way to determine how many were civilians or were insurgents. This is an amazing improvement over the 650,000 Iraqi's quoted so often as having dies in the previous years.
Saddam brought order to Iraq? OK...as a tyrant I suppose he did. I suppose that is the type of country you would prefer to live in.
Remember...we had our years of internal conflict that killed 50,000 in just 3 days....it was call the Civil War and the Battle of Gettysburg. Not the best time to have ever lived in the US but we survived and it's not a bad place to live today.
I don't know the future for Iraq. After having spent 18 months over in Iraq I can only hope and pray that the Iraqi government will eventually be capable of running it's own country without our troops on the ground.
2007-01-16 22:30:58
·
answer #3
·
answered by iraq51 7
·
1⤊
1⤋
Well lets consider this. Fact, Saddam killed over 1 million Iranians in his 8 years of war with Iran for their oil fields. Fact: Saddam ordered the use of chemical weapons against civilian populations in the Kurdish north. Killing entire villages, then sending in the his army to destroy the villages and killing any survivors. Fact: Saddam had Shiite Muslims in the southern part of the country summarily executed because of an attempted rebellion. Most of these were buried in mass graves while most of were not yet dead from gunshot wounds, or were buried alive. Saddam didn't just kill 148 Shiites, he killed hundreds of thousand of Iraqi's. Most of the deaths in Iraq have been caused by factional fighting Sunni against Shiite, as well as outside influences interfering. So before you go rambling about Bush being a mass murderer, look at the facts.
2007-01-16 22:33:48
·
answer #4
·
answered by GIOSTORMUSN 5
·
1⤊
1⤋
Iraq is not the war, it is the battlefield. The war we fight in Iraq is simply the gathering point for two opposing ideologies. Like it or not, sides have been chosen. You may think that you are not on this side, but you are. You are most definitely are not on that side. You had better understand how important it is that we win there. I guarantee they understand that whoever wins in Iraq will determine the course of the region for the next 100 years
2007-01-16 22:36:13
·
answer #5
·
answered by ronjambo 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
30,000? even more were killed by Saddam. You know if I have a missile in my shed and next to it is a chemical warhead in the US I have a WMD. To the media because it was not put together in Iraq...it does not qualify as a WMD, Iraq had dismantled it or it was accidentally put in Iraq.
If Castro did what Saddam did, kill millions of his own people, updating chemical warfare and was supporting terrorist, the US would've taken Castro out just to protect our borders.
2007-01-16 22:29:34
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
2⤋
It seems such as you may desire to be on the fringe of osama or the top of the Iraq,s public family. 40,000 in 3 yrs damn they might desire to be genuine sturdy taking photographs milk bottles. purely think of it took 10 yrs for 55000 to be kiled in Viet Nam. think approximately to be one among osama,s infants to have confidence that stuff
2016-10-07 07:00:50
·
answer #7
·
answered by blumenkrantz 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Who said Iraq is unstable?? Next they will be saying silly things about Iran!
Saddam . his brother and one of the inner circle are dead, Americans are in control and are handing over the power of infrastructure as we speak and we are not winning the war ,.... but not losing it either.
I know cos your President told me so. and we know no American President would ever lie to its people, the Coalition of the Witless, the UN or the free world.
2007-01-16 22:29:51
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
3⤋
Not one Iraqi Died due to Instability! they were Blown up by Bombs planted by themselves and other Muslims from Iran and Syria. Oh and some were shot by Americans as they planted bombs.
2007-01-16 22:21:14
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
3⤋
30,000 is a drop in the bucket compared to the 100,000 plus that
saddam gassed to death in the 80's. saddam is better off dead anyway.
2007-01-16 22:28:25
·
answer #10
·
answered by sharma 4
·
3⤊
2⤋