Also, shoul'nt our military hunt down both sunni ans sh'iite insurgents in Iraq and destroy them?What about Syria? they have a hand in this also. With George Bush' speech I surely thought that finally the U.S. military would get a handle on the terrorists. What about the military buildup in Iraq. Why won't we hit them where it hurts?what happens if we don't stop them? Does'nt anyone realize what will happen to us in the U.S. if we don't stop the terrorists? Also what about the liberal influence on our president and his cabinet? should'nt he stop listening to them? all they want to do is appease the terrorist like Chamberlain did with Hitler in ww2. I fear for our very existence in the future.Won't a real man step up and put a stop to the terrorism before it comes to our shores again? We need a real gung ho military leader like General Macarthur to really get the military going on a path to win in Iraq and put Iran in it's place.Does anyone else agree?
2007-01-16 21:36:49 · 11 answers · asked by cheekydogg2 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Military
Also, why do these muslims try to force teir religion on non muslims? If I wanted to be muslim I'd convert, but I don't and never will be muslim.
2007-01-16 21:38:08 · update #1
we don't have to invade iran. they are more of a threat to israel than the u.s. and israel has the worlds 4th strongest military so we have ne need to worry.
2007-01-16 23:25:39 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
If America wants to test the Iranian resolve just think back to the "rescue" mission that was launched to save the Embassy hostages.
That will be the shape of things to come.
What is most likely to happen is what has happened for centuries, Arabic groups will put aside their own hatreds and work together to detroy the "infedel" and when that is done will again pick up where they left off.
Iran will be assaulting US troops from the front and iraqis from behind.
US only lost 50,000 dead in Vietnam , unless they are lookinhg for a new record then the answer would be , dont even think about it......these people are more cunning and devious in the ways of warfare than American technology could ever be.
The real question is Does Americas mothers want to send more of their sons to be sent off to be killed for a debious cause with no real game plan?
2007-01-16 22:21:12 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
It quite sickens me to confirm posts like nuke em and invade them right here in Yahoo solutions it shows me there is no wish for humanity after all; even with the reality that i'm hostile to Iran authorities for oppressing there own human beings its no longer ideal to do a similar barabic technique with a view to sparkling up some thing. there is continually different recommendations into fixing a difficulty. That if there's a difficulty like a mass guns of destruction to start with, even with the reality that there authorities is oppressing there own human beings different international leaders should not be invading it for that reason really they should be assisting the protesters. Its unhappy quite that people many times is the only which will wreck one yet another in the great.
2016-11-24 22:52:19 · answer #3 · answered by persingerjr 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No. Iran is doing nothing wrong. They have the right to enrich uranium for nuclear power just as any country does. No one has the right to make judgements on what they are doing without concrete proof. The USA is in Iraq even though there was no proof. Bush just admitted on tv that there were no weapons of mass destruction. No proof yet they still invaded. The same thing will happen to Iran because Israel doesnt like them and the US is in their pockets. The Iranian president has been misquoted multiple times yet mainstream media keeps using these quotes. I live in Canada and think the USA should mind its own business.
2007-01-16 21:46:47 · answer #4 · answered by melvinbenjamin 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Do you not see that your country clearly not capable of invading Iran? Where would the many thousands of troops come from? It's not even an issue.
2007-01-16 21:51:13 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
With current weapons technology and "yield" capabilities Iran doesn't need to be invaded to be destroyed.
Just a thought for consideration.
2007-01-16 23:26:08 · answer #6 · answered by iraq51 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I think your nose is smelling bad, I you think something like that, then you should not think about your soldiers in Iraq and Afghanistan too.
it is not something easy, already you have lost some 4,000 soldiers in Iraq and Afghanistan, and if you think something stupid about Iran, that would be your last chance of existence on the earth surface.
2007-01-16 21:48:58 · answer #7 · answered by Judge 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
first of all .terrorists will be always there and if usa invades iran then defently the usa will get their *** kicked like hell from all sides.And until now nobody is winning in iraq
2007-01-17 00:36:07 · answer #8 · answered by sweety4live2000 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Just give me the freakin' launch codes and there will be no conflict in the middle east .
2007-01-16 23:26:39 · answer #9 · answered by Ray H 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
no they shouldent... but theere is oil there so they will. and no doubt tony blair will fall in line even knowing the british people are aginst him.... again!!! if politions listen to the british public they would find that everything they have done they dont like. same in america
2007-01-16 22:37:49 · answer #10 · answered by Time is nigh 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋