English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2007-01-16 21:09:54 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Military

9 answers

Kenneth- I am thinking that you didnt phrase your question correctly. How could you possibly think that your local Police Department would be better equipped than the Army ??? When was the last time that you saw a Police Officer make a traffic stop in a M-1 Main Battle Tank ?? Or in a M2 Bradley Fighting Vehicle ?? Or Fly in an AH-64 Apache ?? Those three items have answered your question without even straining to think of all of the additional Gee Whiz stuff that the rest of the Army gets to play with.

Bugs Bunny - Please tell me your not serious !!!! So the Police get to arrest someone..... Ok and ???? The Army gets to BLOW stuff UP!!!!! Hmmmmmm tough to decide there..... Lets see Arrest someone ??? Or BLOW Something UP ?????? Gee this one is very difficult for me to decide........ BLOWING Stuff Up wins by a thread ..... I am only kidding BLOWING things UP would win everytime.


James M : You forgot about the Mk-19 40mm Machine Gun Grenade Launcher !!!!! The Cool M-1114 Up Armored HMMWV, Or the ASV which lucky for me never had to deal with. LOL

2007-01-17 00:43:26 · answer #1 · answered by JohnRingold 4 · 0 0

What????????????????
Better weapons, bigger weapons, better vests, more toys.
Did you read your question?
I rolled down a city street with 4 Hummers , 2 .50 cal, 2 240B, and 15 automatic weapons and 15 M9s. We carried AT-4s. We also had radios and could call 2 Apache helicopters to our location within 10 minutes. We also had M109A6 howitzers at the FOB. Now I do not know where you are from but here in my town the police carry M9s and we have no helicopter. I choose Army.

BUGS? What are you thinking? Soldiers in Iraq detain people everyday. We carry "zipties" and lock them up when they do bad things. We have cool checkpoints (we had Tanks at our checkpoints) There is no kind a deterrent like 50 Iraqi soldiers with tanks and bmps. They shoot quite frequently.

2007-01-24 00:58:49 · answer #2 · answered by mferunden 2 · 0 0

Far better.
Army has a different role to play.
Fighting an enemy is much more than maintaining local Law & Order situation.
Army has to deal with adversaries who are very well organized, equipped and are capable of putting up resistances to an unknown level, hence the preparations to deal with such determined forces have to be of exteremely high standard and almost perfect.

2007-01-17 05:21:44 · answer #3 · answered by Saadi 5 · 0 0

Surely... Police is a local force which only has to handle city or state law and order rather army is the force looking for security of country.

2007-01-17 05:19:53 · answer #4 · answered by Seeker of Justice 1 · 0 0

Well I am an MP, military police, and we are more equipped than regular police, but we carry M-4, a 9mil pistol and either a SAW, or a .50cal. So again, yes.

2007-01-17 09:52:52 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Well when you call 911, the police dont fly up in fighter jets or roll up in tanks, so I would say yes.

2007-01-17 05:18:49 · answer #6 · answered by tmills883 5 · 2 0

I would hope so. I've never seen a traffic cop driving a tank.

2007-01-17 06:11:04 · answer #7 · answered by desiderio 5 · 0 0

USUALLY POLICE IS BETTER EQUIPPED THAN ARMY BECAUSE THEY CAN ARREST ANYONE AT ANYWHERE EVEN BY CREATING ILLEGAL F.I.Rs.

2007-01-17 05:24:50 · answer #8 · answered by bugs bunny 1 · 0 1

If you mean mechanical things, yes, if you are taking about what really matters, brains, NO.

2007-01-17 09:55:42 · answer #9 · answered by WC 7 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers