English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

We have 6,550,000,000 people. Thats alot. But if the earth is really even 1 million years old TAKING INTO ACCOUNT death, famine, disease, lack of cities, starvation, murder, wars and genocide the earth should have

10,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000
000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000
000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000
000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000
000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000
000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000
000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000
000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000
000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 times 1000.

Thats ALOT of missing people!! Where are they? Nothing can account for it other than a YOUNGER earth.

Today, we're taught that humans evolved about 2 million years ago. Then why are there only 6 billion people in the world? In the year 2000, the world's population topped 6 billion. In 1985, it passed 5 billion. In 1977, it topped 4 billion. In 1962, it passed 3 billion. In 1930, the world's population was approximately 2 billion. In 1800, it was approximately 1 billion. Based on ancient census data, scholars estimate the world's population was about 1/4 billion at the time of Christ (1 AD). The Flood was approximately 4,400 years ago, with 8 human survivors. If we follow the population growth curve, we see that the world's human population could have come from 4 couples 4,400 years ago. It seems the human population growth rate is about 2% per year. Well, what about all of the wars, famines, plagues, etc? Take the Black Plague for example. It killed off 1/3 of Europe's entire population. Yet, in less than 100 years, the population bounced back and surpassed the original population. This is because the infrastructure was already established. The world's population took a dive during World War II, but immediately came back with the baby boomers. After a great loss, there is always a massive boom. The bottom line is this: if humans have been around for 1 million years (half of the 2 million presupposed by evolutionists), according to the current growth rate, the world's human population should be 10^8600. That's a 10 with 8,600 zeros after it!

2007-01-16 19:33:55 · 18 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture Religion & Spirituality

18 answers

The Bible is alive, because its God's words.

2007-01-16 19:44:25 · answer #1 · answered by الحقيقة 4 · 2 5

You have enough lies in that statement to call yourself a great Creationist. If you start from a population of 8 in 4400BC, the population now would have just topped 10^56. The curve from 1930-2000 is close to exponential with a growth rate of only 1.63%. If you extapolate it back, the world population was 8 in 736AD. Starting with 8 in 4400BC, using the number derived for the curve, you get less than 10^46. Of course, that curve generates a population of 1/4 billion in 1800. Simply put, your numbers don't support your model, and your model doesn't support your numbers. That's Creation Science at it's finest. Your proof of the truth of the Bible is a total lie. What does that say of the Bible?

2007-01-16 20:45:18 · answer #2 · answered by novangelis 7 · 1 2

I haven't found a question in there but I did read an awful lot of gibberish. You are talking complete nonsense. You know that? No of course you don't. OK one point you make the flood, That flood is a proven historical fact. However it didn't actually cover the whole world did it. Even bibilical scholars (the bright ones anyway) accept that. It was Noah's whole world granted but it was actually on that area of the middle east. So actually there wasn't only 8 survivors was there.

Admittedly the human race does come from an extremely small group of people but the population doesn't expand and a fixed rate throughout history. Like any species the population growns within the limits of our environment.

Read Bryson's Short history of almost everything, it'll give you much more useful information than the bible can.

2007-01-16 19:43:17 · answer #3 · answered by gerrifriend 6 · 2 3

Population growth doens't work the way you think it does.
In 1859, twenty-four rabbits were released in australia, in ten years two million could be killed a year without noticalbly effecting the population. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rabbits_in_Australia#Introduction_of_rabbits_to_Australia.
Just those killed represented a more than 8,000 times those born ten years before. If the 2 bunnies that got off noahs arc breat like this in 10 year there would have been 16,000, in ten years, 128 million, one hundered years 2.147x10to the thrityninth.
Where have all the bunnies gone?

2007-01-16 19:59:52 · answer #4 · answered by Zarathustra 5 · 5 1

You make false assumptions. Compared to even 100,000 years ago, the Earth has undergone many changes. At any given time, most of the population could be gone & destroyed. Even that book says there was a major population on the Earth in the days of Noah. False assumptions can lead you down the trail of any false conclusion.

2007-01-16 19:47:09 · answer #5 · answered by BIGUS_RICKUS 4 · 2 1

Well, Isaiah does speak of a morning star, or son of the dawn, but it is not talking about Lucifer. It's speaking of the Babylonian dynasty. Just as you read, king of Babylonia. As for two different individuals being referred to as a morning star, I wouldn't worry overmuch. The phrase "king of kings" is applied both to Jesus and to Nebuchadnezzar too. But it doesn't really present a problem. So too stars are often used metaphorically to speak of different individuals. Even the term heavens is sometimes used to refer to ruling powers other than God's own heavens. Hannah J Paul

2016-05-23 23:24:39 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Either you believe the earth will be able to support that number in the future, or you know that all of your calculations are false.

Follow the population growth curve???

Do you really think that, say, mortality rates for babies and children right now in most of the world are as high as 10,000 years ago?

In short: You are either mistaken or lying.

2007-01-16 19:46:27 · answer #7 · answered by eldad9 6 · 1 1

You never understood population growths huh? The many assumptions and lies within your argument would probably be bigger than whatever number you are making up should be of people.

I demand a refund for your education.

2007-01-16 20:00:23 · answer #8 · answered by Alucard 4 · 3 0

Use to be man wanted children to help on the farm, now we have intercourse mainly for pleasure. In ancient times childbirth often took both the mother and the enfant.

And 'abnormal' babies did not survive.

Now we have reliable forms of birth control.

All of this may explain the missing people.

2007-01-16 19:41:48 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 4 1

That's not true,The Black Death kill more people than 1000 years of human war history.

2007-01-16 19:44:44 · answer #10 · answered by Green Lantern 4 · 3 1

You idiot. Who said people have been here for 1 million years? People werent just magically planted here as soon as the earth was created. Do some research.

2007-01-16 19:38:56 · answer #11 · answered by melvinbenjamin 3 · 1 3

fedest.com, questions and answers