English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2007-01-16 15:52:51 · 7 answers · asked by 1776_2007 2 in Politics & Government Military

For those who want to know about the forged documents I am refering to the docs. that bush said showed Saddam was trying to buy uranium from Niger, but were found to be forged, remember the "downing street memo"...

2007-01-16 16:05:51 · update #1

7 answers

The Uniform Code of Military Justice, playing devil's advocate.

2007-01-16 15:59:10 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

by way of fact Bush senior stopped him wanting killing Saddam leaving Saddam w. capacity over Iraq yet under the U. S.'s thumb. This introduced approximately Iraq undercutting OPEC and almost loose oil for involved by over a decade whilst palms inspectors crawled everywhere in the rustic. MI5 killed the only ultimate palms inspector who threatened to tell the reality (for the Brits) relating to the WMDs nonexistence. Supposedly Colin coulda, woulda, long previous each of how in Gulf conflict one appeasing US morons yet that could have created the very mess we've as we communicate extremely of the golden years of inexpensive oil the Clinton's have been proficient.. the guy is in-credible and a proved liar who worked frustrating to help reason around a million to die unnecessarily so a techniques, i merely can not comprehend why he isn't working for president, could be something even worse than what we do comprehend already hidden! With pals like him..

2016-12-16 06:31:58 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

It would appear that you are unable to think for yourself and believe the hype and lies from the media and the far left. I would like to know why you think our orders are unlawful... is it because someone told you the war was illegal? Illegal by whose standards? There is no world gov't that exercises control of sovereign nations such as the US and, since the Kennedy administration, the National Security Strategy of the United States, which I doubt you've even read, provides for pre-emtives strikes. Perhaps you're referring to the forged documents that were used by the Clinton administration to first determine that Iraq was a threat and possessed WMD's. Which lies from Colin Powell? Because you disagree with his statements, they're lies? Before making such ridiculous statements, do some research and form educated opinions.

2007-01-16 16:02:30 · answer #3 · answered by dr_law2003 3 · 3 1

Troops follow the lawful orders of those appointed over them...the officer corp. They don't follow so-called orders in documents, Mr. Powell or the UN.

And BTW...what documents do you claim are forged and impact the possible orders given to the troops? Care to provide any supporting documentation or sources of your own? Sounds as if you are guilty of your own claim.

2007-01-16 16:00:47 · answer #4 · answered by iraq51 7 · 3 1

If an order is un-lawful then you should be able to quote an existing 'on the books' law that forbids that act.

Your political opinions are irrelevant when it comes to determining whether or not any act is legal or illegal.

2007-01-17 02:00:25 · answer #5 · answered by MikeGolf 7 · 0 1

Insurgents shoot at them, they shoot back. Ever heard the term "politics go out the window once the first bullet goes by your head"

Why would the join the military then not follow orders? That would be pretty stupid if you ask me.

2007-01-16 17:12:12 · answer #6 · answered by Curt 4 · 0 1

you cant prove that

2007-01-16 15:56:59 · answer #7 · answered by kleighs mommy 7 · 1 1

fedest.com, questions and answers