English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

While most other women in the world prefer intact penises? This sums it up-


I hate to tell you, but asking American girls this question will never yield you an honest, or well-informed answer. There are only two countries on the planet that routinely mutilate baby boy's penises: Israel and the United States. In Israel it is done for religious purposes, but in the United States the history of circumsicion is far more barbaric. Initially introduced as a means to prevent masturbation in teenage boys in the 1800's, the reasons and excuses for circumsizing have changed, and ranged from the bogus argument that it's "cleaner" (no longer medically accepted), that it "reduces disease" (another debunked myth), and finally, the truth behind it rests with the multi BILLION dollar foreskin trade that exists within the medical community and pharmacutical companies. That's right, for every foreskin they lop off, the doctor sells it for over $1000 US, for each one.

2007-01-16 14:52:48 · 25 answers · asked by da_bigunit 1 in Family & Relationships Singles & Dating

The problem, you see, is that American woman (as well as men) have been conditioned and brainwashed into believing that circumsicion is normal, that's the way men are supposed to be, that it's healthy, that it's clean, and most American women have never seen a natural, intact penis. The are grossed out and horrified when they first see it, because it's human nature for the ill-informed to be frightened by things they have no knowledge of. Since they've never seen on, they've obviously never touched one, smelled one, or had sex with one, so their opinions are utterly meaningless. Watch them give me a thumbs down in rage, as they hate the truth being told, they hate being embarassed for their own lack of knowledge and understanding.

2007-01-16 14:53:12 · update #1

The truth is, when women have been with BOTH cut and uncut penises, that women overwhelmingly prefer the natural, intact penis to the mutilated one. We don't often see these studies published in mainstream American journals because the results of those surveys make the majority of American men who lack a foreskin feel inferior. Yet, they ARE inferior. They are missing a critical part of their sexual anatomy. It is critical not only for men, but for women as well. The foreskin keeps the glans (head) moist, like the mucus membrane it was intended to be, it produces copious amounts of lubrication to make intercourse easier, it is enriched with thousands of sensitive nerve endings for pleasurable sex, and it contains pheromones which increase sexual attraction in the opposite sex.

2007-01-16 14:53:26 · update #2

I did not write this, I copied and pasted it.

2007-01-16 15:00:15 · update #3

kelly p, stfu! Have u ever seen a babie in pain from circumcision? And some of us take showers and clean. Sorry if I am not the typical inbred hill billy you are accustomed to having as clients.

2007-01-16 15:02:02 · update #4

I forgot to fully paste the money part. Basically, they make billions off of the procedure and medicines and creams used to treat it after.

2007-01-16 15:07:11 · update #5

It was started to prevent masterubation ages ago. research it. There is no link that it prevents cancer, that was the original purpose of it. Over 90% of the world's men are NOT circumcized (half of the circumcized men come from the US). I am correct.

2007-01-16 15:11:07 · update #6

Using foreskins for embryonic stem cells in research.

2007-01-16 15:13:41 · update #7

25 answers

dated a guy w/ out the cut.. it was nasty i didn't want to hurt his feelings and the sex was the WORST. so ur an ***. get ur dick cut like it says in the bible. and move on and stop playin w/ ur dick!

2007-01-16 14:59:07 · answer #1 · answered by kelly p 2 · 3 4

They will know the difference. If you were in a country that was mainly uncircumcised they wouldn't know any better. Men aren't as obsessed with every little detail of mens' penises as men are. Most prefer circumcised. This can range from some who would not have sex with an uncircumcised man to the majority who would be okay with it if they loved the guy. Some women even prefer uncircumcised. Of those who are most against it it will be the look or concerns about personal hygeine. Of those who won't mind their preference will be based on look, feel or function. Of those who prefer uncircumcised it will be because they think it is more natural and will probably also oppose vaccination. So generally women won't care but that isn't the same thing as a preference. Don't mix them up.

2016-05-23 22:53:01 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

Hummmm, didn't you kind of answer your own question.
Why do American women prefer circumcision so much?
What do American women have to compare to?
I've never been with an uncircumcised man before, so I could not tell you whether I prefer one or not.
It's not just Israel and the United States who are doing this. You have your facts wrong there. This is a Jewish and Christian belief. I know a woman who is married to a French man. He is circumcised. I am married to a black man from Africa, he is circumcised. So more "Christian and Jewish" society areas follow this practice.

I'm not sure where you got the information that it was introduced as a means to prevent masturbation in boys. I do know that as a fact my doctor assured me that to circumcise my son for health purposes was the main reason he suggested it be done. And we were offered the foreskin to keep if we wanted it, which we didn't. I watched him toss it into a trash receptacle myself so if there is some "conspiracy" out there in the medical community then my doctor missed out on a lot of money for his retirement.

Sucking others into your conspiracy theory might be ok, but this woman aint following you down the white rabbit hole.

2007-01-16 15:08:47 · answer #3 · answered by goddessatanea 2 · 6 0

very good point. i understand where you are comming from. here's my thoughts:

i've been with both circumsized, and uncircumsized men, and the uncircumsized ones were less appealing to me. why? sitting here right now i couldnt really answer that for sure. which means that i cant come up with any solid reason, any reason to give you that would make it seems ok for me to feel that way. one reason may be because the first man that i was with that was uncircumsized gave me a lot of yeast infections. the bacteria that built up in his foreskin led to my yeast infections. perhaps other men keep it cleaner, who knows? but i was dating this man for 2 years, and i saw him wash regularly, so there shouldnt have been a reason for it. but even my doctor that treated my yeast infections said that that was the reason for them.

I do agree that we are somewhat "brainwashed". new mothers and fathers decide to have their baby circumsized because the father is circumsized, because its more appealing to the opposite sex, because its cleaner...all the things u said above. all those reasons...things we've been conditioned to believe.

its a gruesome practice, and i've often wondered if i would ever have my child circumsized if i ever had a little boy...i dont really think that it matters to me so much...but i think about how he would feel about his body when he grew older. would he hate me for not having it done? would his future partners find him unattractive?

the thing is: our society (united states) has been doing this for so long, that women, and most men, have come to think that circumsized is natural, and uncircumsized is un natural. we've forgotten that its the other way around. we're in so deep in the circumsizion pool that i dont think we could ever turn back. i highly doubt that the united states could go back to a natural state where the majority of men are uncircumsized.

just my thoughts....

2007-01-16 15:09:32 · answer #4 · answered by jeneric803 3 · 3 1

Um...I am going to have to question where you are getting your facts. How is it "no longer medically accepted" as being cleaner? I believe that this is just common sense. There are plenty of men out there who don't lift the skin to clean and believe me, you can tell (it stinks!!!!) Same thing with with the reduction of diseases, if you don't clean there, again, it just makes sense that you are susceptible to certain diseases. Lastly, most men in the United States are circumcised and that's what American women are used to so it only makes sense that women are going to be in favor of what they have been exposed to the most. I'm sure that women from other countries prefer uncircumcised men because that is what they have been exposed to.

I am a woman, I have been exposed to both, and I prefer a circumcised man for all of the reasons above.

if you don't understand where it came from, http://www.cirp.org/library/history/

2007-01-16 16:03:23 · answer #5 · answered by ? 3 · 4 1

ok. i'll be honest. i've never been or even seen an uncircumcised one. except in pictures.

would i be grossed out by a non-circ? i don't think so. i'd say that i would be curious for all the reason why one would be curious.

i would hope that he keeps the folds clean. if there's an infection brewing, the more chances the girl will get infected. isn't it just easier to clean a circ one?

anyways. i don't think that there would be a difference in feeling. it still depends on the guy's skills in bed and how generous he is with you.

2007-01-16 15:09:48 · answer #6 · answered by m 2 · 3 1

Why are you asking this? It sounds like you already have it figured out for yourself. I don't believe that they have been mutilated either. It is cleaner for someone who does not clean it properly, like small boys and even in their teens. It also has been proved that circumcised men are 50% less likely to contract an STD. And it's all we know as American women. I'm sure if someone fell in love with you before they had sex with you then they wouldn't care about the circumcision issue as long as you were clean and hygienic

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/15593753/

2007-01-16 15:02:57 · answer #7 · answered by harvem2000 2 · 5 1

I worked for a pediatrician for 10 years and I've never seen him digging in the biohazard container or vaccutainer for a foreskin to sell.That's rediculous! At least in the US.On a personal level, I prefer the looks of a circumsized penis, they look sexier.

2007-01-16 15:03:59 · answer #8 · answered by gabeymac♥ 5 · 4 1

I think a circumcised penis looks better and this procedure is done when the baby boy is a few minutes old and he does not remember it anyway. Plus, an uncircumcised penis has to be washed more carefully than a circumcised penis due to "dirt or other particles" getting caught in under the skin...so you are incorrect my friend!

It sounds like the doctor may have cut a little too much off of your package and you are pissed at the world!!

2007-01-16 15:02:53 · answer #9 · answered by September Sweetie 5 · 4 3

I agree with you somewhat that a lot of rationales for circumsion have been debunked. However, a study just came out in the news that there are many more STDs in Africa among uncircumsized men. So, your great proof isn't necessarily true on all accounts. However, it may be because they haven't learn proper hygiene in order to cleanse their uncircumsized selves.

2007-01-16 15:00:39 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 4 0

I didn't know all of that but I have been with both and I hands down like the way a circumsized penis fells in my mouth. So sorry. It seems that maybe you have grossed out a lot of women with your penis to have such strong feelings about our individual taste. Ignorant or not we like what we like. Just like we like to shave our underarms and legs, and other women from other countries do not. Stay with women you know will like your penis so you're not embarreses.

2007-01-16 15:04:06 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 3 1

fedest.com, questions and answers