English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

He says he is considering getting circumcised and that an ex of his told him there is a definate difference in feeling for a woman between having sex with a man who is circumcised and one who is not. Is that true? how does it feel different?

2007-01-16 12:28:25 · 22 answers · asked by elle k 1 in Family & Relationships Singles & Dating

22 answers

To me, I've found that the uncircumcized slips out more often than not and can get annoying ... And the foreskin must be held back for oral sex.....

And in old age they have more difficulty keeping themselves clean with that skin in tact. I personally prefer it gone....

2007-01-16 12:33:18 · answer #1 · answered by Brenda 6 · 1 0

There is no difference in sensation for a woman. NONE.
There is a difference in giving him oral sex. The circumcised man is much nicer to do that with than a uncircumcised male.

There is a difference in sensitivity for the man. THe men who are uncirced feel they have a more sensitive tip or glans because it isn't rubbing against material all the time.

There is a correlation between cervical problems and men who are not circumcised. The important thing is that he needs to be clean, clean clean if not circumcised.

Lastly, it isn't minor surgery for a grown man to do! I doubt he will go through with it.

2007-01-16 12:34:33 · answer #2 · answered by Tempest88 5 · 1 0

Circumcision is usually done at birth to prevent illness and infection and as an effective method of penile hygiene. Having sex is not a factor in the decision to circumcise babies. As a grown person this could be a painful surgical procedure. He should seriously consider this and read all about it before deciding to do this.

By the way, It all feels the same with a condom, which he should be using.

2007-01-16 12:39:58 · answer #3 · answered by sherockstn 4 · 1 0

It can help, but it's really not that noticable to me. My current man is the only one that I've been with that isn't circumcized. While he is good at what he does, I don't beleive it is because of the extra skin.

Go to this page, it really goes into detail. I looked it up myself a while back because I was worried about infections caused in uncircumcised males.

http://www.cirp.org/pages/anat/

My main problem with uncircumcized men, the hygene factor. It easily becomes what I call "stale" and if he doesn't keep it really clean, it can get a musky odor due to the moisture trapped under the fold. If you somehow miss the smell and get that taste in your mouth you are gonna know it. Yuck.

2007-01-16 12:37:31 · answer #4 · answered by tryingmybest79 4 · 1 0

No, there isn't a real difference. Some women prefer them cut, others like them natural. As far as getting circumcised, it reduces your chances of contracting HIV (so says a very recent study, anyway.)

2007-01-16 12:33:40 · answer #5 · answered by stampadhesive 2 · 1 0

They do smell distinct (lady's stuff has a tendency to be extra flowery). My wager is that maximum human beings promises you strange looks and some human beings will ask you in case you're donning lady's body spray. it truly is slightly strange to placed on it, yet to each and each his own. I a lot choose the smells of fellows's cologne and that i do not very like maximum perfumes. even as i became youthful a pal made exciting of me on the mall because I sprayed some on my wrist (i did not understand the version between body spray and cologne back then, besides the undeniable fact that it made me unhappy that i could not placed on it after I grew up).

2016-11-24 22:09:14 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Personally ive never felt a difference, but i belive circumzition is best, i know a guy who had to get cicumzided at 18 how awful that was, plus its cleaner and feels better for the guy!

2007-01-16 12:50:05 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

There is no difference in feeling for a woman if her man is cut or not cut.

If he is an adult and has no physical problems from having an intact member, I would advise against it.
It would be a painful, bloody, mess.

2007-01-16 12:32:42 · answer #8 · answered by Dawn Davenport 3 · 0 1

He's pulling your leg. The difference in sensation is only for the man.

2007-01-16 12:32:04 · answer #9 · answered by S K 7 · 0 0

It is supposed to be better for a man to be uncircumcised. I guess there is much more feeling since the head isn't exposed all the time and it is more sensitive.

2007-01-16 12:32:44 · answer #10 · answered by Age1983 2 · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers