What exactly is the difference between 4MP fine and normal?

Question

Obviously one picks out fine detail but which is better to use when?

Answer 1

Exactly? It depends on the specific model of camera (my Panasonic Lumix LZ5 has two resolution settings, but my old Fujifilm Finepix 2400Zoom had three). Generally? "Fine" is a less compressed format than "Normal", which results in a cleaner image (less grainy, fewer digital artifacts, better for printed copies), where the Normal setting will result in one with a smaller file size that's better for e-mail or webpage design. It's possible to recompress a Fine image to be roughly equal to what the Normal setting would have produced, but there's no good way to reintroduce digital resolution that's just not there in the original image file. The one other consideration you should keep in mind is that Fine images, having a larger file size, will fill your camera cards up a lot faster than the more compressed Normal images. If you're a serious photobug, this probably won't matter to you as you'll have invested in enough flash memory to last you long enough to dump them all to a laptop computer or other mass-storage cache device. If you're the sort of person who just likes to shoot lots of photos, but doesn't want to invest tons of money into the supplies (though keep in mind that you'll spend a lot more over time having film rolls developed vs. buying a few large capacity camera cards, especially now that you can get 1GB cards so cheap), you might want to either stick with low-res or smaller format (e.g. shooting a 1600x1200 photo on a camera that's capable of shooting at 3200x2400) photos to maximize your capacity without spending more money. If you just take a few shots here and there, but never even come close to maxing out one of your typical camera cards, by all means shoot at the best resolution available to you.

Before you just pick one over the other, try shooting the same shot with a high-res/large format photo, a high-res/small format photo, a low-res/large format photo, and a low-res/small format photo and compare the results with each other. Try running them all through your favorite editting software as well, and if any of the lower settings produced results that you really weren't happy with, remember to avoid using them in the future. And consider buying more flash memory cards. Seriously, you can get many of them for a song these days.

Answer 2

the version is that in case you generalise in line with gender, race and so on this is while it particularly is sexist or racist. Your situation is which you state or comnment approximately women oftentimes, no longer some or some. And all your statements are adverse, so which you're in simple terms generalising the entire inhabitants of ladies in a bad way in simple terms bnecause you have had some undesirable reviews. There are not any gender changes and so on sexual organs. We cazn see this as quickly as we study diverse cultures the place masculine and female roles and habit is reversed. And the place precisely have you ever acquire your statistics that 80% of ladies seek for adult males who're 'above them'??? you have in simple terms made that up Mike ;-) Why do women seek for a guy with a solid interest? simply by fact we seek for somebody in our circle. We would not elect a bum or an ignroant guy who can't be bothered to artwork and so leeches of everybody else. i might choose to work out your interviews, statistics and pshychological exams opn your statements at the same time with women helping adult males. you're sexist because you purely generalise on your guy or woman little head. you have no longer particularly achieved any exams or amassed reserach.

Answer 3

if you want to take alot of pictures, use normal. if you want very good detail within the picture, use fine mode.