Muslims insist that Muhammad's beheading of 800 (after battle of Badr, google it) jewish prisoners was the "just" course, as opposed to imprisonment or enslavement or truce.
Now, we dont have the jews side of the story, because Muhammad killed them all, so we cant hear their account about whether they deserved to all be beheaded or whether it was all a misunderstanding. Even to this day Arabia is 100% jew free. Muhammad achieved what Hitler couldnt.
Muhammad claimed that the jews were "conspiring". This is always the best charge to make against people you want to murder, who havent done anything to you, because it requires no proof. Muhammad of course offered no proof, we are just supposed to take his word for it.
Lets suppose the Jews actually did "conspire", whatever the hell that would have meant back then...did that warrant genocide?
Muhammad often enslaved his enemies, so why didnt he at least enslave them? Was every single jew guilty of conspiracy?
2007-01-16 11:12:20 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
Did they have to betray him. NO they didn't
However they did betray him.
The rule of betrayel of such a scale is death. period.
2007-01-16 11:18:43 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 5⤋
I don't CARE about what GOOGLE says about how Muhammad (peace be upon him) supposedly "beheaded" those Jews and the Battle of Badr!!! I care about what the QURAN says about the Battle of Badr!!!!! Do you even know the history of the Battle of Badr????? Muslims were EXTREMELY few, and their enemies were A LOT!!!!! YET, the Muslims WON the battle!!
DURING wars, you can kill your enemies (and NOT their friends/families/pets/houses/plants, etc. etc. if they're not participating in the war), but AFTER the war, you CANNOT kill ANYONE!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Quran, 9:6: "But the treatires are not dissolved with those Pagans with whom you have entered into alliance and who have you subsequently failed you in aught, nor aided anyone against you. So fulfill your engagements with them to the end of their term: for God Loves the righteous."
If the Quran hated non-Muslims and wanted them all killed, then it wouldn't say:
"If one among the Pagans ask thee for asylum, grant it to him so that he may hear the Word of God; and then escort him to where he can be secure" (Quran, 9:6).
Continue trying to slander Islam, but you won't succeed, as I've been saying to all other uneducated-about-Islam non-Muslims like you. Stop living in ignorance, will you?
Peace and blessings be upon you!
2007-01-16 15:34:01 · answer #2 · answered by ♡♥ sHaNu ♥♡ 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
They did have a truce.
The Jews of Madinah broke a treaty signed by them and the Muslims. They attacked the women and children of the Muslims who were in battle at the time. Plus they took sides with the enemy of Muslims, thinking they would win (Muslims were outnumbered almost 10:1 anyway). So, that would count as treason.
2007-01-16 11:32:50 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 2⤋
The only thing I would tell you is that...GO TAKE SOME HISTORY CLASSESS.
You start a really big topic and you dont even have a clue about them.
You talk only for one side, you hiding the other side.
First of all, you would have to know what was going on.
Dont just take a piece and paste.
And I bit you been to some anti-Islamic website and copied this whole thing.
2007-01-16 11:33:29 · answer #4 · answered by kais 2 · 2⤊ 2⤋
First of all, it was not Muhammad who ordered the death of the jews , it was Sa'ad Ibn Muad, who was chosen as the judge. he used to be an alley of the Banu Qurayza tribe but they betrayed the muslims and twice tried to kill the Prophet (pbuh). the tribe fought but was defeated and then yes, they were killed. but it was not through hatred of jews. hitler killed because of the fact that they were jews. cant you see that the fact that the muslims were allies of the jews shows that islam does not call you to kill just because they are non-muslims. and the reason they were killed was only because of their actions. If you are going to read up on history use unbiased sources.
and if you still hate islam because of this, read Deuteronomy 20:12-14.
2007-01-16 11:28:02 · answer #5 · answered by E.T.01 5 · 6⤊ 2⤋
Your lack of information is showing with the aid of right here. a million.)we at the instant are not islamists. we are Muslims by way of fact the Quran has precise. and a pair of.) in keeping with possibility you may checklist the justifications as to why He did what He did. those have been people who fought against hinm and tried to kill him each possibility they have been given by way of fact he exchange into preaching monotheism and it exchange into interferring with their polytheistic and barbaristic way of lifestyles. it is a non-situation for us by way of fact all of us comprehend our history. guess it is a controversy for you given which you're nonetheless caught returned on what our call is.
2016-12-16 06:21:31 · answer #6 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The victors always get to write history, if he had lost the battle, he would be known as a butcher, but her won, he is just,. it's just a matter of perspective...Like John Kerry, he lost eh election, so for Democrats he is a friggin loser, had he won he would be lauded as the greatest president since JFK...
2007-01-16 11:16:48 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 8⤊ 0⤋
I don't think your question is serious. If you really wanted to know you would read the Quran, instead you get the passages from an anti Muslim website. You can't understand something unless you look at the full context.
2007-01-16 11:18:39 · answer #8 · answered by brickity hussein brack 5 · 4⤊ 3⤋
Sounds like Muhammad was a horrible murdering psycho sicko thug. Boy, things sure haven't changed much, have they? (e.g., Nick Berg, et al.)
2007-01-16 11:17:24 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 5⤋
do you belive in what peole say let me tell it is not good how do you even trust google . don't put trust in any body
2007-01-16 11:18:20 · answer #10 · answered by what ever ? 2 · 4⤊ 5⤋