2007-01-16 10:39:01 · 18 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Immigration
ok...but who is gonna mow ur lawn???
2007-01-16 10:45:50 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
I'm going to pretend this is a real question. Here's what would happen.
If you nuke Iraq you wouldn't kill the entire population. You'd only irradiate them and make the land uninhabitable. This of course would turn international opinion even further against us and possibly create a situation where another nuclear power would send missles our way.
To send all the Mexicans to Iraq would cost trillions of dollars we don't have. Plus I don't think they'd go willingly so it would be a major military campaign. This would stretch our military even further and leave us open to terroist attack and would cause international opinion to turn even further against us than it was when we blew up Iraq.
If you read your history the U.S. has tried twice in the past to conquer Mexico and failed both times. I think taking the American southwest should be enough for now.
Now if you're talking about exporting all Mexicans even in the continental United States I don't think you've taken into account the billions of dollars lost in tax revenue and the devestating effect that would have on the hotel industry, agriculture and new home construction.
So congrats on asking the most ingnorant question I've heard all day.
2007-01-16 10:49:08 · answer #2 · answered by actionfolksinger 2 · 0⤊ 2⤋
I hope you're not serious about this. But if you were then this would actually benefit the Mexicans, because the reason they even left Mexico was
cause there is nothing there. But in Iraq there is plenty of oil. Which is why we are at war in the first place.
2007-01-16 12:40:09 · answer #3 · answered by gonzo 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Sounds like a good idea. At least it would kill two birds with one stone. Hence the war in iraq and boder concerns, then we can take over Mexico. Texas need more land. Alot there that can be put into good use.
2007-01-16 10:43:45 · answer #4 · answered by nukem_thebomb 3 · 1⤊ 2⤋
I don't think smart is the issue. How about is it realistically possible. And what happens to America if America is now Mexico.
2007-01-16 10:43:18 · answer #5 · answered by ajillity 3 · 0⤊ 2⤋
nuking iraq won't work until we can find a way to make cars go on radioactive gasoline.
2007-01-16 10:41:46 · answer #6 · answered by nostradamus02012 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
LOL
i dont know how the mexicans are gonna feel about living in nuclear fallout iraq :)
2007-01-16 10:43:41 · answer #7 · answered by Scrapper Jack 3 · 1⤊ 2⤋
well it's like saying is it smart to move all americans to europe so mexico can have america my answer is no i don't think it's smart. put yourself in the mexicans situation
2007-01-16 10:45:01 · answer #8 · answered by peter pan 1 · 0⤊ 3⤋
well we have a problem with both, so do the second one(move them) then the first one(nuke it)
2007-01-16 10:43:22 · answer #9 · answered by keepinitril 3 · 3⤊ 2⤋
No. The whole idea you have there is stupid. But it would make for a funny bit on SNL. Maybe you should write for them. (or not)
2007-01-16 10:43:00 · answer #10 · answered by Noodles 4 · 0⤊ 3⤋
How about we give Mexicans back there land and send you back wherever your from. Unless you are a Native American.
2007-01-16 10:43:42 · answer #11 · answered by juan68701 4 · 1⤊ 5⤋