57.8 is 17% of what number?

Answer 1

A very easy question but that seems to be the beauty of it. After all, there are many who pose difficult questions and test ignorance the hard way. here is a baby who is testing our ability. The answer, even if obvious, has been given arithmetically, algebraically, common sense use and so on. I am just repeating what all others have answered not with a view to get the 'best answer' cliche but to be one of the crowd. To get the required number, use the following simple approach:
57.8 is 17% of some number, say , x
That is, 57.8 is equal to .17 X x
Hence, X is equal to 57.8/.17= 340
Now, an advantage of asking such a naive question--getting so many approaches to solve and learning so many ways of communicating. Carry on, baby! Best of luck.

Answer 2

340

17% = 57.8

17/100 = 57.8

then
X = (57.8*100)/17

Answer 3

340

Answer 4

340

Answer 5

340

Answer 6

(57.8/17)*100= 340

Answer 7

340 (57.8 divided by .17)

Answer 8

57.8 = .17 x

x = 57.8/.17 = 340

Answer 9

The number is 340.

Answer 10

First, you could in reality blame Obama for the entire $6 T in case you count number the funds that became in position even as he took workplace, left by the Bush administration. 2d, you have not any answer if we ask you what might want to have got here about if he had no longer better the debt, because you do not understand how the monetary equipment works. All you may do is criticize Obama for doing some thing that became mandatory to save us from falling off the cliff right into a serious melancholy, as Hoover's guidelines led to in 1929. became an astounding melancholy what you've been searching for? 0.33, no longer in reality Obama supporters yet many economists agree that the first stimulus ought to no longer in reality were larger yet released swifter. Now, how might want to you've evaluated Obama if the stimulus had no longer saved or created between a million and a couple of million jobs? enable me wager - he doesn't understand a thanks to fix the monetary equipment, ideal? Fourth, you do not understand what you're talking about about the debt. there is in no way going to be a time even as all of our lenders(80% of them human beings) are going to call for all their money back right away. it truly is because they can provide up earning activity on it. This debt ingredient is yet another boogeyman dropped on those who do no longer pay interest to scare them from balloting Democrats, even as Bush doubled the debt for the time of his words.