English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

the impression i get is he is reposnible for deciding who in the govenrmnet can be prosesucted and whoi cant where as the public seemingly have no choice over crimes they commited. blair in comparsion cvould have a prosecutoion blocked for a crime he commited whereas we dont have that privelge

2007-01-15 23:06:43 · 2 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Other - Politics & Government

2 answers

He's there to retrospectively justify whatever the government does and to convince us that it is legal.

(Chief Law Officer)

2007-01-15 23:10:20 · answer #1 · answered by LongJohns 7 · 0 0

DIVIDE & RULE

2007-01-15 23:11:10 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers