i wish he didn't get hung, and should have gotten a fair trial.
2007-01-15 23:07:43
·
answer #1
·
answered by howardlee1977 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
He and his cohorts terrorized Iraq, and terrorism is what countless human beings discovered. something discovered the thanks to lie low. No, i don't believe of Saddam Hussein changed into solid for his u . s . a .. I do comprehend that some populations are literally not waiting for self rule. Palestinians, for instance. And that's that dictatorship is ideal at times, although i desire it would want to be non everlasting. however the Iraqis braved lack of existence threats to vote, and they did not pick a homicidal maniac. Iraq has the misfortune to have become a crucial to the conflict between Islamist extremists and Western democracy. however the warfare received't end there. it will be international-huge earlier it ends. i desire the West wins.
2016-12-02 08:52:41
·
answer #2
·
answered by brenneman 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
ALL LIFE IS SACRED. His life, no matter what he did, should not have been ended like that. I'm a white republican, patriotic American, and this whole thing is a bunch of you know what. What ever happened to Thou shall not kill? or Do unto others. We need to treat all life with more dignity and respect no matter what the conditions are because these types of persons here on earth may always be with us. Lets find a better way to correct our wrongs then through perpetuating suffering through cruel forms of death.
2007-01-15 23:14:10
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
If you subscribe to "an eye for an eye and a tooth for a tooth" biblical idea, I would suspect that Hussein did not have enough of either. But is revenge the sole motive of a civil society?
2007-01-15 23:09:58
·
answer #4
·
answered by emiliosailez 6
·
3⤊
0⤋
I think no any reliable party yet rose to prove his crime or innocence. All we say about him are based on our own beliefs, with what knowledge we are enriched by, coming from unreliable sources, who themselves are criminal hands and faces behind over garments. Hence to speak of an honest judgment, only God knows if he really received what he deserved or was it unfaithfulness to him.
2007-01-15 23:10:50
·
answer #5
·
answered by Alkahest 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
He got off easy. They should have thrown him into prison for 17 years, keeping him alive, just so they could carry out sentence after he spent a long while in a box.
2007-01-15 23:11:36
·
answer #6
·
answered by no longer waiting 3
·
0⤊
1⤋
I am anti-war and anti-Bush. Yes, Saddam got what he deserved, but I wish we could leave NOW, and I wish we hadn't taken this on all by ourselves under false pretenses.
2007-01-15 23:06:47
·
answer #7
·
answered by just browsin 6
·
0⤊
2⤋
Yes but I think it was to quick. I believe that it should have taken days or even weeks to kill him. Let him suffer as he made so many others do.
2007-01-15 23:07:42
·
answer #8
·
answered by bildymooner 6
·
0⤊
1⤋
He should've been quartered. Hanging was only like 30 seconds of pain. Not enough.
2007-01-15 23:08:12
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
2⤋
I think hanging was too good for him. He should have been sentenced to a life of hard labour.
2007-01-15 23:06:56
·
answer #10
·
answered by jammer 6
·
0⤊
1⤋
The fact he was an april born taurus kind of bothers me.
2007-01-15 23:06:51
·
answer #11
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋